• EddoWagt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Indeed, but I’m sure we can agree that it’s pretty stupid for every distro to maintain its own repo. That’s a lot of duplicate work, which could be spend on more useful things. Luckily flatpak is well on its way to change that

    • smiletolerantly@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hm… But different distros have different philosophies (not just) about updates. That’s part of why people choose a specific distro.

      Theres still plenty speaking against flatpak (larger sizes, problems with GTK/qt themes, and it’s only meant for GUI applications - you still need a separate system for the kernel and lower-level/cli tools. And frankly, that makes flatpak unusable to me, because the purpose of a centralized package management system is not having duplicate systems).

      So in short: y’all are gonna pry pacman from my cold, dead hand.

      • EddoWagt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not against distros as a whole, some extra work will be inevitable because people have different preferences, but it feels like a waste having a Firefox package for arch, ubuntu, fedora and Debian while essentially all being identical. Indeed flatpak isn’t perfect yet, but it works great for me and it’s steadily improving