• neidu2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’d think that once you’re at the level where you not only stick around in the dumpster fire, but also willingly give your money to this manchild, you lack the awareness needed to see how bad a blue checkmark looks on you anyway.

    EDIT: I have been informed that some get the blue checkmark against their will and without paying. Just when you thought xitter couldn’t get dumber…

    • youngalfred@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      7 months ago

      Iirc just recently they started giving out blue ticks to people with lots of followers, regardless of if they wanted it. Then this week they make it so you can’t hide them. It seems like a dim move - piss off the people who bring lots of traffic to your website, but actively decided to not get a blue tick, by forcing the tick on them.
      If they didn’t leave beforehand, maybe this would make some people/orgs consider leaving?

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He’s been forcing blue checks on people since the initial change - with Stephen King, for instance. Basically a way to promote the program and make it look like prominent people are paying, but also a confused mix with the previous verification checks.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Only other twitter users see the blue checkmark. The people who think it’s dumb aren’t around.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      FYI: Blue checkmarks were a thing LONG before paying for blue checkmarks was a thing. In the end, I think most people who are making an issue out of this aren’t even twitter users (let alone checkmark users) themselves.

      • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nobody is unaware of that. It’s just that before Musk took over, the checkmark meant something completely different. What it means today is potentially embarrassing enough for people to want to hide it. Now they can’t.

        Before Musk the checkmark meant “This user’s identity has been verified and they are notable enough to need that verification”.

        Today it means “This user pays for Twitter”.

        • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          Seriously, I don’t understand tgat person’s point. Before elon the check ment “yes this really is Billy West, voice actor for a lot of things”. It wasn’t a hard concept.

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t get it, what’s so bad about blue checkmarks? I know you can “buy” them now, but what of it?

    • kosanovskiy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some beans were hiding it to avoid being scrutinized for paying into Elons platform.but still wanted to have their name, pretty much marketing and loosing money.

    • elxeno@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think ppl with blue check shitting on elon and twitter were being called out for paying and supporting him.