• MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, isn’t that how trademark is supposed to work? I’m no expert or anything but the original creator hadn’t used the trademark in over ten years and ostensibly had no intention to do so. He also didn’t respond to the notice of opposition.

    Seems to me the courts did the right thing in letting gametech have the trademark if they intended to use it.

    That’s not to say that I support them making a shitty Cryptobro game but them obtaining the trademark by itself doesn’t really seem shady to me.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would be entirely fine with Flappy Bird passing into the public domain, but this isn’t even that. They actually own it now.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So now they’re gonna take on the liability of copying someone else’s work, which is why the original creator kinda disappeared; they were worried about getting sued over both the concept (which he stole from a rather unknown game that released a year prior to Flappy Bird) and the use of the pipes taken straight out of Super Mario.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very loaded and negative title. People wanted to make Flappy Bird publically available again, sincd its creator took it down indefinitely.

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s very easy to make a mechanical clone of the game if someone wanted to play it.

      This is purely about greedy crypto bros trying to grift off of Flappy Bird and using legal loopholes to steal the trademark

    • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They could’ve done that without the greedy crypto aspect, but as the enshittification trend goes, they just couldn’t help themselves.

      But Gametech’s efforts to legally acquire the Flappy Bird name seem to go back much further than that. Back in 2014, an outfit called Mobile Media Partners tried to claim the Flappy Bird trademark in a filing made mere days after Nguyen pulled the game from the App Store. Coincidentally enough, the specific New Jersey address listed by Mobile Media Partners on that 2014 application matches an address used by Gametech Holdings in the paperwork for its 2023 legal efforts.

      Purely opportunistic bullshit and painting it as anything innocent is disingenuous.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Did you even read the article?

      This is not the same Flappy Bird. The original game already has been preserved, the APK is floating around if you know where to look.

      This new game is an outright scam using stolen IP to trick users into thinking this is the original.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re scum for the grift but flappy bird doesn’t deserve a trademark. US IP laws are draconian enough.