• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Recognizing that every choice is loss is the first step.

    The second step is figuring out the best course of action to minimize the losses. This step can be VERY hard.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s pretty sad how many people are downvoting this kind of article that goes over the actual feelings of people trying to vote their conscious and do the right thing. People should actually read the article and understand what’s happening in swing states like Michigan. Ignoring the problem isn’t going to make it go away.

    At the end of the day, we’re being presented with a little bit of a false choice: If people can be protesting on this scale, and we don’t have an option that can align with that, and you can suppress anti-genocide voters in that calculus, I don’t know what kind of democracy you’re protecting. And that’s really heavy. My sister is trying to fill in her ballot, and she’s like, “I feel physically nauseous.” That’s real. If I see a shredded child on my timeline again, I don’t know what I’m expected to do, like, vote for that?

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Any form of criticism of the Democrats is seen as an automatic endorsement of Trump. The result is when articles like this are posted here, the community doesn’t want to acknowledge this problem exists. Democrats have a very big chance of losing Michigan, and no one wants to acknowledge it.

  • citrusface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hope you have a great view of all the dead children up there on your moral high ground.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago
    The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Intercept:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.
    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://theintercept.com/2024/11/01/voters-election-harris-trump-israel-gaza/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support