• Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A comment section with actual thought and reason. My god, is this 2009 era internet?!

    • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No— it is more viable to set up cryogenic hydrogen infrastructure at an airport than replacing our gas stations with hydrogen stations along our roads today. Additionally, the amount of cooling, insulation, and pressurization equipment required will almost certainly be far too large and expensive to fit in a $20-30k passenger vehicle.

      Realistically, if we assume a decarbonized future, it’s seeming that battery electric will be used in most small passenger vehicles (cars and trucks today), whereas hydrogen will be used in heavy equipment (construction, extraction, military) and aviation.

        • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The commercial trucks could fit the equipment, yes. However, you also need to consider the infrastructure. What would be the investment required to replace every truck stop with hydrogen refilling stations?

          Could it be done? Yes. Is it the most likely option? Harder to say.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Easier to retrofit a gas station with hydrogen tanks than it is to build substations at the gas station to help with the power draw from evs charging.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You better tell that to Toyota and a lot of the other big players who are quietly still working on hydrogen ICE vehicles.

        • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At most it could work for huge trucks but the economy doesn’t scale.

        • money_loo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Toyota only seems to work on alternative fuels for the PR and propaganda, unfortunately.

          That’s always been slightly better than almost every other car manufacturer, which pretends only oil exists, but not by much since they are basically gaslighting us all.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Naa, they know that without a major leap in battery capabilities, hydrogen is way easier to swap over to. Existing gas stations can be converted quickly, you can fill up a hydrogen car in a few seconds/minutes unlike EVs, and the current ICE’s can be basically reused to handle hydrogen (the design not the motor in your current car just the design). It’s a no brainier to go towards this.

            • money_loo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with all of that but the issue is between the governments and the manufacturers both seeming to want the other to roll out the upgraded infrastructure, it puts hydrogen in a chicken and an egg situation of us waiting to see which comes first, the cars or the chargers.

              At least with electric you simply need to swap out the sources at the ground level to something cleaner(something we’re doing anyways), and you can safely plug in anywhere.

              Don’t get me wrong, I love the idea of hydrogen, but as a scientist, it’s the implementation that has me worried.

              • Benj1B@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see the most likely outcome being legislated electric charging at petrol stations(like Germany has just done), possibly with subsidies, while the bulk of hydrogen infrastructure is private investment.

                Once a bean counter finds it more valuable to retrofit a truck fleet with hydrogen and set up their own refuelling stations at distribution centres - i.e. for journeys that can be completed in one tank load - you bet the hydrogen will start to flow. From there it’ll be up to the service station network to figure out if it’s worthwhile to put infrastructure in at certain larger truck stops.

                By the time we get there, the trucks will be mostly autonomous and the driver probably just an emergency role - so they’ll run as close to 24/7 as possible and the reduced refuelling time will have a substantial impact. It’ll either be that, or some sort of massive battery bank transfer system the truck can pull into to have it’s battery swapped - but batteries are heavy, and automating that would be inordinately expensive. Hydrogen seems more feasible a fossil fuel replacement when trip length/refueling time are your main concerns

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You nailed it. At the end of the day, EVs are really only practical for people who don’t drive much. Not only that, you would absolutely need a battery swap system. Or each gas station would need to become a damn substation for the power company. Trying to draw that much power is unfeasible.

            • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most people don’t have a gas pump at home/work. I don’t think ICE cars can ever replace the way people use EVs.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Most small towns don’t have substations either. Do remember the more people with EVs the greater the power draw.

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s effectively the same though, if the electricity for the small vehicles is generated by burning hydrogen

          • Infynis@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You wouldn’t really need fuel cells at a power plant though, would you? Or are there advantages I’m unaware of?

            • TheChurn@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fuel cells can be more efficient than combustion because of direct electrification. With combustion, there needs to be a boiler, turbine, etc and that adds to the losses through the system.

              At industrial scale, it is possible a turbine and boiler is probably the better bet, because the technology is very mature and large fuel cells may pose extra challenges with sourcing the membranes. It would need a more in-depth cost analysis.

      • Omnifarious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do remember hearing about these some time ago. Would like to see this as a viable option here in the States. Have no idea if that will happen, though.

  • porkins@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s cryogenic, will it work in warm climates. Is it cheaper than conventional jet fuel?

      • Intralexical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, the ambient temperature being 37°C versus 0°C already makes a significant difference in terms of e.g. the air density and the amount of lift the wings get, how easy or hard it is to start up the engines, whether ice is a problem, etc.

        If the 15% difference in delta also translates to a 15% cost/efficiency difference, then that can absolutely make the difference in whether the technology is economically viable to apply at scale compared to its alternatives.

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      is la and san fran in summer hot enough? they have hydrogen refueling stations for cars there and afaik they work year round. if they work that is.

    • mookulator@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We could theoretically subsidize our way through the cost difference until it becomes cheap enough to sustain through market mechanisms

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no electric powered aircraft before this? I find that hard to believe. Propellers with electric engines? I should probably read and look up stuff, but I’m hoping someone will point out how I’m wrong to think that, so I don’t have to. Maybe I should have been a bit more incredulous.

    What is this bullshit title? Worlds first electric aircraft my ass!