• Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can you give one example of a long-term, large scale, non-hierarchical system in human society?

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anarchism. We used it for most of human history, hierarchical societies are only 6k years old. The human species has existed for 200k years.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, because everyone everywhere for all of history has followed the exact same formula for organizing and defending their tribes.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anarchism. We used it for most of human history

        Total horseshit.

        Name one society based on Anarchism

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Examples of intentional anarchical societies don’t meet the criteria of anarchical societies?

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                This was the actual original request

                Can you give one example of a long-term, large scale, non-hierarchical system in human society?

                Nothing on that page is an example of this

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I spent 5 seconds during my morning routine to look this up. Would you rather I spend 3 hours writing a dissertation on all of the indigenous communities that have existed since prehistory that are structured in an egalitarian and anarchical way? You’re also allowed to look this shit up. I recommend Andrewism on youtube, he pulls a lot of examples from anarchical indigenous societies

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’d rather you not post dumb pro-anarchy takes. That requires 0 seconds out of your day.

          • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And where are they today?

            Can you give one example of a long-term, large scale, non-hierarchical system in human society?

        • vettnerk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Teenage anarchism ideologies basically boild down to “So I won’t have to go to school and read anymore”. If they actually knew what anarchism is, they’d be surprised to learn that there is a lot of reading to do in order to fully understand an anarchist society or one of its many sub-structures.

          Anarchy doesn’t necessarily mean chaos without structure, as many believe. However, chaos without structure is one of the variants of anarchy.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most laws that exist serve to protect private property. An anarchist society wouldn’t have private property, so most laws that exist would be to punish transgressions between individuals. Political anarchy is not “do whatever you want, whenever you want, no exceptions”. It’s a direct democracy without hierarchy, with elected stewards to manage the shared property in a library economy.

        • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Anarchism is not the absence of law.

          So why don’t YOU take your teenager education and learn more?

            • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s almost like having a job that pays okay is still A) Not making me happy and B) contributing to the Earth’s destruction.

              • SeducingCamel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I love working the majority of my waking life just to scrape by, what a wonderful system where the only escape is being born privileged or working yourself even closer to death and taking advantage of other people to start a business

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But we evolved away from it as our societies and needs became more complex. Maybe it worked when we were hunter gatherers living in caves but modern society requires a heriarchy to organise and maintain it.

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Many complex societies were egalitarian eg Cucatenia Trypillia, IVC etc.

          We didn’t “evolve” away from egalitarianism because complexity yada yada yada. Hierarchy just won because it’s more oppressive and violent.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            To organise and manage. Who’s going to set and control healthcare? The economy? Utilities? Infrastructure? Defence?Education? Justice? Social care? I don’t have the time nor will to make informed decisions about every single policy or law. I’d imagine the vast majority of people are ere same. We have representatives to make these decisions for us.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              All of those “problems” are predicated on the ideas that private ownership of the means of production is necessary, that borders are a natural phenomenon, and that the social ills under capitalism are facts of life experienced by everyone in every era. None of that is true. Why don’t you have the time or energy to help organize and be involved with your community? Is it because of work? We’ve made tremendous strides in automating the means of production, but what has that meant for us? More people unemployed and unable to pay for the necessities in life, while we maintain the 40 hour work week to do the same work in one day as a 100 hour work week in 1900. We don’t need to move at this breakneck pace to make someone else billions of dollars.

              • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t think any of the things I listed have anything to do with who owns the means of production. They’re all public (well maybe not in every country) services. And policy and regulation has to be set for them as time goes on.

                Honestly, I don’t want to be much involved in my community. It just doesn’t interest me, I’d rather spend time with my family or spend time on my hobbies.

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I disagree on that, but I don’t have the mental health capacity anymore to elaborate.

                  That’s understandable too, and we should have the ability to do so without a pursuit of wages. The coercive nature of work prevents you from enjoying the things you want to enjoy. Personally, I consider the theft of our free time cruelty. I want to have time to see my friends and family that live hours away. I want to work on the apps I started in college. I want to go fishing. I want to be a contributing member of my community. I can’t do any of that, because I need to pay for food, rent, electricity, vehicle maintenance, my education loan, and more. A system that forces us to suppress our desires in favor of seeking a wage is unjust, and does far more harm to people as a society than anything an individual could do on their own. I don’t want to turn those personal apps into a “side-hustle”, I just want to make something in the hopes that at least someone finds it useful and can enjoy it. I want a society that encourages our kindhearted, social, and generous nature, not one that purely emphasizes our greedy side.