• Bop@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m getting the sense that some of these commentors are the same person.

  • Zhao@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What the fuck is with these comments about rent and value meals. Those prices were gonna increase regardless. Look the fuck around.

    • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      No idea, I hope they all belong to one instance so they can be easily defederated.

      Go back to your shitty capitalist platforms if putting profits over people is something you agree with, you’re not welcome here.

    • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They don’t need an excuse. In the absence of some other limiting factor they will raise rent to what the market can bear, and it turns out that when it comes to something with as severe a supply constraint as land has, the market can bear an awful lot.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        In the absence of some other limiting factor they will raise rent to what the market can bear

        This is literally what I’ve been saying from the very beginning. They charge what people are able and willing to pay.

        • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, not even close. Housing is a necessity. It’s not a new iPhone. You can’t just say “wow housing prices are way too high I guess I’ll fuck off to the forest.” This is already in the initial stages of systemic collapse. The lords will keep squeezing and raising prices, and more and more people are being left behind. You see this all over, notably in the rise of homelessness and tent-cities.

    • burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They raise the rent either way. If minimum wage was indexed to inflation since 1960’s it would be over 25 dollars.

      20$ is still way too low. Workers produce more now than ever but get paid less than they did in the 60’s.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            But like, how can they milk us for more than we’re able to give?

            Yeah, you can charge $100 billion for a studio apartment, but nobody is going to buy it.

            The same logic is at play for raising rent. You can’t raise it beyond what people can pay, or else you’ll lose customers and make less money overall.

            Not sure why this needs to be explained to you. You think they’re refusing to charge $100 billion for a studio apartment out of the goodness of their hearts? Lol. No. It’s market forces.

              • bobman@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                You still don’t understand, lol.

                Even if people were relying on credit cards to pay, there’s still a limit that landlords would have to price around.

                My god. This is why this generation sucks with money, lol. Most of you don’t have a clue what’s going on yet think you’re being clever.

                Ahh well.