• HidingCat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I get the criticism, but the Fairphone really shouldn’t be compared to other (especially Chinese-made) phones in the same way. It’s about sustainability and fairer labour (hopefully anyway).

    So far the main issue I see is with the battery life, 4200 mAH battery on a 778G-class SoC should be doing better than this.

    • random65837@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      58
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seriously, what’s “sustainable” about a one off phone, that most people have never heard of, that you won’t be able to get your replacement parts for in another couple years, assuming theyre even still making them?

      I know sustainable is a buzz word talking point these days, but c’mon. I’m all for the free market, competition, and everything built not coming from China, but at some point reaility needs to be part of the equation.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s still easy to get parts for Fairphone 4 and most parts (some out of stock, unclear if permanently) for Fairphone 3, and some parts for Fairphone 2.

        And how is fairphone supposed to get people to hear about the phones without making the phone in the first place?

        And it isn’t really a one off since they have made 5 different phone models and some other stuff in the last decade.

        They also support their phones software for a relatively long time.

        • telllos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s just amazing how many people comment under fairphone post without knowing anything about the brand. I guess it’s mostly American user because it’s not sold in North America.

          But fairphone has been operating since 2013, they are not a one off.

          It’s really awesome what they are doing especially as they are the only one doing this. The right to repai is super important for consumer. It’s very sad to see people calling those issue “woke”.

          When people of every background and political spectrum are victim of corporation preventing them to easily fix what they buy.

          Talk to any farmers about jon dear! Or any buy it for life enthusiasts.

  • sol@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Anyone know how well the Fairphone 5 compares against the Samsung Galaxy S10? I know the specs are pretty public but I don’t follow this stuff that closely so find it difficult to draw comparisons between different chips etc.

    My S10 is on its last legs so I think a bit about what I will buy to replace it. I really like the idea of the Fairphone but of course you pay a lot (relatively speaking) for the ethics. One of the worries is that the phone will become unusable in a few years anyway, either because parts are unavailable or because software has become too heavy. The other option I am leaving towards is a second hand Pixel.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You don’t actually pay a lot. You pay what is fair. The only reason other phones cost less, that is, cheaper is, precisely, because of all the shortcuts these corporations unethically took.

      For example: a burger shop can offer you a $4.99 burger, or the same burger at $0.49 with stolen meat processed by underpaid employees working 7 days a week for 12 hours. You get used to the $0.49 deal, then you start seeing the $4.99 burger as “very expensive.”

      • sol@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m well aware, I just meant that it costs a lot more than other phones of similar quality. Not saying there aren’t good reasons for that.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re technically correct, but again: It’s not that the fairphone costs a lot more. It’s that the other phones cost a lot less for horrible reasons.

    • dublet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Fairphone is faster - although perhaps not by a huge amount, has better battery life and a better camera. The official spare parts shop has parts for the Fairphone 3 onwards, earlier models’ parts are sold out. The Fairphone 2 was released in 2015 and has stopped receiving software updates this year, the 3 came out in 2019. 8 years of support and replacement parts seems to me to be much better than what Samsung or Google would offer you.

      Specs differences: https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?&idPhone1=12540&idPhone2=9536#diff-*,*,*

      Chipset comparison: https://versus.com/en/qualcomm-qcm6490-vs-samsung-exynos-9820

      Spare parts shop: https://shop.fairphone.com/shop/category/spare-parts-4?ref=header

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      What is the reason your S10 is on it’s last legs? If you see yourself needing a lot more power, maybe the FP5 isn’t the best bet for you because you’re right, it might not be useful to you in the later years of it’s life. However, I’m not sure what people are doing with the current top-of-the-line SoCs to justify that much power (if people want it to play games or for non-practical reasons, that’s fine too). As an S10e user, I feel like we’ve come to a point where my current phone should be powerful enough for the foreseeable future. My only issues are I’m no longer getting official software updates (I’ll probably go with a Custom ROM soon), my battery life is a bit shorter than I’d like, and parts are getting hard to come by with most being “new old stock” at best.

      • sol@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t think I need more power. The charging and headphone ports don’t work (so need to use wireless charging) and battery life is quite poor. I don’t feel like the phone is too slow or anything so I imagine the FP5 would be plenty of power.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The charging and headphone ports don’t work (so need to use wireless charging) and battery life is quite poor.

          Have you looked into having your S10 serviced? I was willing to have my charging port changed a few weeks ago, but the technician chose to clean it first, and that’s worked perfectly and was even cheaper. Is your battery in poor health and might need to be replaced?

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’d be sold if it wasn’t literally 2.5x the price of any other phone I’m looking at. Sheesh. Yeah and I’d love to change out parts and tinker with the possibilities, too. What’s that gonna cost me?

    Edit - also other major brands might have removable batteries by the time I’m buying again.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      The phone is expensive because they try their best to source materials from the least exploitative businesses. But yeah I can get a refurbished Pixel phone for $100 so I won’t be buying Fairphone anytime soon. The most sustainable phone is the one you already have (or the one that already exists)

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Despite the issues, and knowing that a different phone would get me a much better value at a lower price, I was going to buy one of these.

    …but then I saw it wasn’t available in the US. So I went with a (used) Pixel 7 on ebay instead. Considering this is the 5th iteration and they still don’t have a US variant, I’m not going to get my hopes up. I know Murena sells a US variant of the Fairphone 4, but apparently it uses the same exact modem, so using it in the US will result in connectivity issues.

    at least I’m recycling!

    • warmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      With the recent GNOME adaptivity changes, I wouldn’t buy a phone without video out, being able to use my phone as an office PC would be amazing.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      American FP4 user here.

      You may actually be fine, check the 5G bands in use with your national regulatory body and see if there are any missing parts. State side, T-mobile is the only carrier I can use and their 5G bands are missing pieces of what the phone thinks are avalable channels. It corrects them quickly enough for buffered data to have no issues but it drops calls randomly when switching towers… also T-mobiles network is sorta sucky…

      If your country uses GSM, order an EU phone, slap in a sim card on a network that accepts unlocked devices and you should be good to go. If you are on CDMA, wait till Q1 2024 and order one from the states. There are plans to include a custom security and privacy focused android ROM with it, but im happy with my organic euro phone dispite its quirks.

  • ka-chow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Always like the idea of the Fairphone but I always find the chip to be a bit lacking.

    Like if it had (at least) last years flagship chip then I feel like it’d be less of a compromise and the switch to a more sustainable phone would be a much easier sell.

    Can’t imagine using a chip that’s deemed ‘lacking’ now is going to feel any better 4 years down the line.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lacking what? What are you running that a chipset from last year will be struggling?

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t get it, what’s wrong with the 778G? It was a highly competent SoC that was still relevant last year (Samsung’s A series from 2022 couldn’t come close to it with the Exynos line, save the A73 which came with the 778G), and there are gazillions of comptent phones using slower SoCs that work just fine.

      Do people really use their phones or do they look at spec sheets and go, too slow in their mind, like some kind of reverse placebo?

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        or do they look at spec sheets and go, too slow in their mind, like some kind of reverse placebo

        Yes. People hate on the Tensor chip in the Pixel 6/7 because it’s “slow”, despite day to day performance being literally no different than any other phone.

  • DrStrange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    My only worry is the Chip. On the verge of clicking the Buy button but concerned about day to day performance, especially after 5 years or so.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The idea is nice and all, but just keep your phone longer. After 3 years or so, do a factory reset and reinstall ONLY the apps you actually use. That should get you a good year more out of the phone before it starts to get too old. The biggest issue is the lack of seoftware updates. Not getting a new OS is one thing, but the lack of security updates is the biggest problem. Lots of software that people use on a daily basis will stop functioning if they see your OS is behind in security. Unfortunately that’s the problem. Not the hardware, but rather the software.

    • Biorix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would add that it’s the inefficiency of software that drives our phones to the bin.

      The applications often relies on non optimized libraries, or are an aggregation of more and more of features and options that then requires the latest phone in order to work.

  • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know this is ridiculous but, if I’m buying a phone to last at least 5-6 years, I’m going to wait for something with Qi2… I want one of these but I’m thinking about what it’s going to be like to live with long term.

    • b0uldr@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just get an external DAC bruh. If your DAC lasts long enough, it is not unsustainable. Also at most times, a DAC sounds better than the jack itself.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah the built in phone DACs are often quite poor. The Samsung Galaxy S7 I used for a while was a huge downgrade compared to the Apple dongle.