• jucheguevara@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    we must accelerate the movement towards FOSS software as well as CC content that can be republished infinitely … the profiteers know that post-scarcity is a threat to their power

  • ZeBigDong@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    laughs in oldschool ereader

    no wonder they didn’t want to pursue that technology, imagine sharing books for free…they try to sell ebooks for the same as a paperback. lmfao’ who wants some free ebook blogs?

  • bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right now I’m using an old rooted (and beat to hell) nook simple touch for reading a lot of theory. I’m hoping to upgrade to a Kobo one day once I can talk myself into spending the money.

      • bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always been a fan of the things pine is doing, my biggest want in an e-reader is battery longevity. If I can get a week or more in of pretty consistent reading I’d be really happy. The pine note definitely has a faster processor, which makes me think it wouldn’t last quite as long.

        But of course the openness of it would be a huge huge plus regardless.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah for sure, I think battery life is really the key aspect of an ereader as well. From what I’ve seen the screen is what tends to eat up the battery the most, a faster CPU doesn’t necessarily mean a lot of battery drain since it would generally just be idling anyways. And yeah, I’m a big fan of open hardware. Would be amazing if a viable ecosystem develops around that going forward.

  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I forget who linked to these details, but amazon makes stuff like this legally defensible by being ambiguous about ownership of a kindle book… IE when you buy a book, you’re only buying the ability to read / access it, not the book itself.