• Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The double slit experiment demonstrates the wave-particle duality of light.

    You shoot photons at a barrier that has two slits in it. The pattern on the backstop appears as in the top right panel: an interference pattern, because light is behaving as a wave.

    Next, you set up a detector at the slits, so that you can determine which slit each photon passed through, one photon at a time. Now the pattern on the backstop appears as the lower right panel, not an interference pattern, because each photon is acting as a particle.

    Not looking: wave. Looking: particle.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. The issue is that you can’t detect photons without interacting with them. So it isn’t observation like so many people think. It’s that if you interact with subatomic particles you change their state.

      • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The issue is that you can’t detect photons without interacting with them.

        Can’t…So far, right? Like there hasn’t been a method developed to somehow detect indirectly without interaction? I don’t know enough about this to know how one might go about that, but I imagine those that know more might love to given whatever knowledge may be gained.

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Can’t. The only interaction sensors have is with particles. Photons usually. All things give off light but then measuring light itself, measuring is destructive.

        • Klear@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Detecting” equals “interaction” in this context. You can’t detect them without detecting them.

          • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Although, given some further thought, isn’t the double-slit experiment being discussed here sort of demonstrative of a “detection” without detection, i.e. the wave pattern vs. the particle pattern emerging after “detection/measurement/interaction”? Or am I misunderstanding it?

            Is there another way they operate/appear outside of the wave-particle that eludes observation?

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same deal, you’re still measuring and can still determine which photons passed through which slit.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are, just not in an intuitive way. Because you’d know the rate of emission of your light source, the information of when a photon passes slit-2 would still “tag” them (whatever photon didn’t pass slit-1 must have passed slit-2).