• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    Woah, no way! How could this happen? We’ve only been consistently investing more and more money into fossil fuels and infrastructure to both supply and demand them while saying that it doesn’t matter because we bought completely worthless carbon credits..

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m honestly surprised it’s set to fall. I thought we were still increasing fossil fuel use.

    • Adlach@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thank China. Just this year they built more solar infrastructure than the US has in total.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      thing is I usually see things about coal increase and we are back to the peak oil situation now that easy fraking is gone. I know they want to export fraking more internationally and im betting there is going to fraking2 - harder, deeper, longer coming out or just getting it in protected areas. So long story short im betting lower oil/gas with greater coal (also don’t forget russia can’t move its stuff as easily)

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not only is voting and individual life-style changes good solutions to impending global catastrophe, you would also be a racist and/or sexist, for suggesting that those approaches aren’t good enough. Not to mention ableist for suggesting that maybe the status-quo isn’t something that should be upheld.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      They might not be the solution to climate change, but they do help local pollution levels. Or at least they would if people would stop buying ginormous pedestrian-smasher trucks at a rate of 20:1 bev.

      • jonuno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        they do help with local pollution levels

        Not where the resources needed to build them are being extracted, and thats the issue.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Doesn’t stop the brake/tire dust issue, or the fact that it takes so many resources (and carbon waste) to keep churning out individual cars as well as all the pollution and wasted resources and environmental impact of roads and parking lots everywhere.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    We live in such a clownish society society that it’s a mainsteam and generally accepted belief that billionaires will save humanity by escaping the planet they’re burning down and continuing capitalism on an already dead planet. galaxy-brain

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    No worries folks. Was having an interminably long back and forth with a guy who is sure we are going to figure out technology and shit to not only stop using fossil fuels but also resequester what we have done before it even becomes to bad. Oh and if you want to bring in issues around that or point out even if we 100% “solved” global warming it would not fix our pollution of everything problem. Well then you just want it to happen is all.