• coaxil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope they come to the same decision about the Brisbane Olympic Games… one can dream

  • edgarallenpwn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I need my coffee. I clicked on the link expecting to see the cost of hot air balloons being incredibly high.

  • DangerPanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not pretending to be any expert here, just armchair opinions of ways that we could maybe make these types of events more sustainable and bring more benefits to the host.

    I’m just thinking why’d we need a huge stadium to run around in a circle, but truthfully I’m sure it’s very complex.

    • zubfop@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Presumably because lots of people want to watch the people running around in a circle? I don’t think it is very complex!

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t quite understand where this money is going, either. Does Australia not have existing swimming pools and athletics tracks with grandstand seating, near to some existing large hotels? It seems like any large sporting event (see also, the world cup and the Olympics) demands that everything be built brand spanking new for a one-off tournament. Completely pissing money away, couldn’t agree more with cancelling it.

        • DangerPanda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong, maybe they should look to distribute the games in the future, no need for it all your be in one place.

          Give smaller places opportunities to host events where they would have less need for investment and see more returns.

          • Yendor@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you read the article? That’s what they tried to do in Victoria, and it’s part of the reason for the blowouts.

            • DangerPanda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I guess I meant more geographical diverse. They were going regional but still in similar areas anda lot of the cost came from infrastructure to handle large numbers of people, but individual, dispersed towns I assume could more easily handle smaller influxes.

              • rog@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                What smaller towns have world class sporting facilities though? You arent going to be holding world class games of footy at the local school field. You arent going to build a world class venue in a small town because after the event it would go unused. At least the huge multipurpose venues in cities get used year round after the initial event.