• gregw@lemmy.gregw.us
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t that a bit backward? Compress in the cooler area, radiate heat, bring it inside and expand, absorb heat, then carry it outside.

    • Dettweiler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I was thinking. Expansion/absorption happens in the air handler in the house, while compression/radiation happens outside.

      For heating, it usually just turns on an electric coil in the air handler.

      • YerbaYerba@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They work in reverse too. A heat pump can heat more efficiently than a resistance heater.

    • bradmoor@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you were trying to cool a room like with an air conditioner, yes. Heat pumps literally work in reverse, bringing heat in more efficiently than any resistive heater. They output more heat energy than they use, as they are moving heat, not generating it.

      • gregw@lemmy.gregw.us
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re not only for heating though, they can cool as well.

        I guess I interpreted the comic backward; they’re heating the room not cooling it.