• Abyss@lemmy.comfysnug.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always liked this, it has pretty much everything you could want in a personal project: a catchy name and a whimsical idea that is just on the edge of being actually practical.

    • pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there is something oddly mesmerizing about projects that solve an “already-solved-in-a-more-efficient-way” problem in a weird way

  • DeGandalf@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This basically just means the files themselves become the authentication.

    I don’t see a singe use-case, where you couldn’t just use normal private-key encryption and just save the private key to a file somewhere else. And if you want to distribute it to multiple locations, so that you need all of them, then there are also encryption methods for that.

  • Badabinski@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I always thought this was such a cool concept when I was administrating a Hashicorp Vault server. I made 7 fragments for 7 keyholders, and required that 4 or 5 of them (can’t remember) enter their fragments to unlock the Vault server.

  • bigredgiraffe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is cool! This could be a handy way to store important private keys like internal root CA keys in known locations that are distributed across an infrastructure. Oh man, maybe even in a vault file for secrets you don’t need often like break glass credentials and the like. Such a cool and unique idea!

  • Pika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    that’s super cool, almost zero use case but if you have a super sensitive string (such as a bank or wallet code) I guess it’s a good layer of offline security

  • Einar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the way I would keep my stuff safe:

    Now you just need to disperse the horcruxes around the house on various USBs or online locations and hope you can recall where they all are!

  • kemtue@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is actually one use case for it. I create a yearly backup that i distribute across my friends (mostly via CD-ROMs) which include all my files that i can’t afford to lose, like encryption keys, keepass database, crypto wallets (everything that isn’t encrypted data gets aes-encrypted via gpg and a 512-bit key which is stored in the keepass database). But if say a malicious actor gets access to it by social-engineering they could start brute-forcing the keepass-database (good luck though with my passphrase and 10-rounds of argon2 with 4-threads and 4gig vector size), by splitting it into fragments that vector would be closed.