• Smoogy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s crazy to me that the highest populated countries that are most affected by it by that article (China and US) are contributing the most to it (unchecked capitalism) and still refuse see their connnection to their own discomfort

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Undeniably”. Ha. I wish. I’m sure people will still manage to deny climate change, especially those most responsible.

  • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So what? Not like there is anything anyone of of us can do about it. And our politicians don’t give a F as long as oil companies pay their bills.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now you work to change the rules of society so that we can stop adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, and limit the amount of additional warming we see.

    • ATiredPhilosopher@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the risk of sounding doomerish, nothing will change until it’s too late or there’s a revolution and heads roll.

    • timicin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      i had the same thought: NPR did a story on alaskan pipelayers & plumbers that were starting to experience the effects of climate change on the soil about 15-is years ago and then revisited them again about 5-ish years ago. in the first set of interviews from 15 years ago, a big majority refused to attribute the issues that they were experiencing to climate change and in the second set 5 years ago, they nearly unanimously refused to attribute the issues to climate change.

      climate change is now politics and any and all politics will be denied if you want it bad enough

  • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a Climate Change denier but it feels weird that scientists who projected climate change to take a few decades to really fuck us is suddenly melting the planet.

    Right after a pandemic, while AI is killing jobs and a war between Ukraine and Russia can officially escalate to WW3 any day.

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            With an Inconvenient* Truth.

            An uncomfortable truth would have been in the backseat of a Volkswagen (that’s a Mall Rats joke for anyone keeping track at home).

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Kyoto Protocol was negotiated in the nineties. But we had lots of time then, so no rush…


        Back when I was young and naive I figured the Kyoto Protocol would work. We had lots of time then. The climate change is a hoax thing didn’t really take off until the early aughts as I recall.

    • l_one@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      To my knowledge, there had been an understanding that scientists were being fairly conservative with their statements of how bad things were going to get, and how fast it was going to happen.

      I know of two primary drivers for this (which I am somewhat oversimplifying for brevity):

      1. Scientists really didn’t want to get it wrong by saying X will definitely happen by year Y, and then be wrong, thus giving ammunition to climate deniers and vested interests running counter-PR such as oil companies.

      2. Scientists didn’t want to paint a picture of unstoppable, inevitable doom that no person could possibly imagine a way for them to fix, or contribute to fixing, thus leading to the mindset of ‘if there’s no way to stop it why even try?’.

      • Goddard Guryon@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        For your first point, I’d just like to add that the scientists didn’t give conservative estimates to stay clear of conspiracy theorists, but to stay clear of criticisms of fellow scientists. If there’s insufficient data to back up the claims a researcher makes, you can bet the other researchers will always beat the conspiracy theorists in calling out the bullshit.

    • BrotherCod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the whole point. They’re surprised that it’s happening so fast. The acceleration at which things are happening has gone far beyond anything they predicted. My local area hit 40°C a couple of days ago, the highest recorded temperature on record since we started taking temperatures. We’ve had constant temperatures in the high 30s for the past 2 weeks. I can’t remember temperatures this high and I’m almost in my fifth decade on our little blue dot. The icebergs that we see every year failed to show up this year because of the large amount of melt happening in the Arctic, something I can’t remember seeing in my lifetime. I know what I’m saying is all anecdotal but there’s also plenty of evidence supporting global atmospheric warming that’s backed up by scientific data.

    • sci
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      the climate changes greatly improve the likelyhood of extreme events, going from once in a million years to once every few years.

    • CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet you they are as surprised as you are…

      Nothing gets me more depressed than climate crisis these days tbh…

    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what happens when the developed world spends 150 years rejecting the most advanced scientific theory for fear that if the working class gets hold of it they’ll have a revolution.

      The theory being dialectical materialism. It’s unsurprising that China, one of the five states explicitly led by DiaMat, have been acting as fast as possible to wean off fossils.

      The speed at which things are changing – and this year’s changes won’t be the last – makes perfect sense to dialectical materialists. The transformation of quantity into quality is built into this worldview. What’s hard to predict is when a quantitative change will become a transformative leap in quality. The fact of the leap is not in question, however.

      Meanwhile, in most of the rest of the world, most participants in the debate are still operating under the illusion that change is linear. For people who think that things will just get a bit worse every year, what’s a little distracting war in the grand scheme of things, and what does it matter if a pandemic is left to run free?

      Life is cheap and there will always be a little more time in the schedule – to get ‘back to normal’ – before we tackle emissions properly, think the decision-makers. Except it’s precious and there is no spare time. Unless westerners get their act together and challenge imperialism, we better hope that dedollarisation leads to demilitarisation so people can concentrate on healing the world. Otherwise, we’ll be looking back at this year’s weather with the starry eyes of nostalgia.