AssortedBiscuits [they/them]

mfw you still use Windows in 2023 2024 2025 2026

  • 155 Posts
  • 4K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 22nd, 2022

help-circle


  • 100% agree. We rightfully dunk on this bullshit, but our pedagogy towards Marxist works is a lot closer to this than we would like to admit. They think they should learn calculus by reading Principia Mathematica instead of reading a modern calculus textbook which is ultimately derived from Riemann’s works because Riemann and his generation of mathematicians felt that Newton’s proof of calculus was insufficiently rigorous. And of course, Riemann’s formulation of the integral was ultimately deemed insufficient as well which lead to the formation of the Lebesgue integral that is taught in higher math courses. Riemann integral is good enough for calculating the area under polynomials, which is why it is still taught in Calc 1 while Newton’s formulation is left behind because more rigorous formulations exist.










  • The whole fallout with PSL makes me think people aren’t taking it seriously enough. In the Civil Rights movement, you couldn’t even participate in those peaceful marches without first writing your will. The idea was that forcing you to write your will was a reality check on top of your very probable death be handled as smoothly as possible. That’s how serious they took it. This wasn’t the BPP or Malcolm X. This was MLK Jr style marches that online revolutionary larpers think they’re too good for.

    In general, I think it’s better to understand your limitations and do what you’re personally capable of than to do something incompetently and be a burden towards other when you inevitably fail. And there’s a massive chasm between not doing anything and committing revolutionary suicide by joining an underground org. It doesn’t make you a failure if participating in a bake sale that funnels money to socialist orgs is the extend of your praxis. You are still doing praxis even if your praxis is just, “I’ll take care of my friend’s pets while my friend is in jail for protesting against ICE.” From each according to their abilities to each according to their needs.

    I do not know the circumstances of OP’s life to make recommendations on what to do. I believe someone should be given information concerning the risks and costs of every potential decision. There’s a tremendous cost to becoming a revolutionary, but there’s also costs with doing nothing vs joining a mass org vs joining a union and so on. Trying to sugarcoat what a revolutionary entails does a great disservice to OP and OP’s potential comrades who expect him to perform his assigned tasks.


  • The easy part is realizing that some people need to be liquidated for the sake of the revolution. The hard part is realizing “some people” includes other comrades. That’s the real “harden your heart” moment.

    If you read accounts of past revolutionary action, once it reaches past a certain point of intensity, the assumption is that any captured revolutionary has cracked under torture and squealed, making them a traitor to the movement and since the sentence for treachery is death, all captured revolutionary subsequently released will face liquidation regardless of whether they actually cracked under torture or not.




  • I went from greatgrampslop to grampslop to indieslop to making my own mod to moving on from gaming. My abortive experience at modding was cool in its own way, but after so many hours gaming, all I have to show for it in the end are a bunch of save files. At least if I took up woodcarving or sewing or any other DIY hobby I could fix various things or use those created objects in my everyday life.

    These days, the various itches that gaming used to scratch have long since been scratched by other hobbies. Even the conspicuous spending (or fantasy about having enough money to conspicuously spend) itch is now being scratched by solar generators. I would rather blow 1k on some 2000Wh solar generator plus foldable solar panels than on some shitty gaming PC.




  • They’re trying to argue a hard physicalist line in the mind-body problem. Physicalists would say that consciousness is an illusory mental state physically produced by the brain. “The pie tastes good” is actually “my tongue has physical contact with various compounds of the pie that subtly changes various hormones within my body which compels my body to consume more of this pie.” The qualia of the pie’s particular taste and various emotional states associated with the qualia leading to the final evaluation of wanting to eat more of the pie aren’t real in the sense that all of those are just various mind states the physical body has long since made up when the tongue touched the pie. The illusion of consciousness is at best a byproduct of those hormones impacting the brain.

    As you can see, hard physicalism is completely undialectical and pushed by people like Dennett. In a way, hard physicalism can be rejected in the same exact way sophism can be rejected: you might claim that consciousness isn’t real, but you certainly don’t act like consciousness isn’t real.