The correct method has everyone pulling in the same direction like in this schema:
If they all pull, then the oars move through the water to the left, thereby propelling the ship to the right.
In contrast, in the post, everyone pulling exerts a force that is counter clockwise around the vertical axis of the ship.
I would do what I always do and build my own computer. But as for what you should do, probably get a pre-built with AMD GPU, without operating system to avoid paying for Windows, and then follow Valve’s instructions here to install SteamOS: https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/65B4-2AA3-5F37-4227
using a pozidrive bit on a Phillips head
So many people don’t even know Pozidriv exists, even in technical jobs. It keeps surprising me.
Can’t be that viral if the tiktok is already two months old. I think they are just too bad at journalism to check their sources.
here in Australia we have cameras that detect phone usage while driving. The fine itself is issued after a person verifies the photo.
The case in the headline was actually in Queensland, but gadgetreview.com seems to be a terrible site that doesn’t give a shit what it’s even reporting on.
Since the article appears to be mostly a weird collection of badly referenced random cases, let me give you the primary source on the case in the headline:
https://www.tiktok.com/@kristakampz/video/7640403411845877012
Edit and also to save you having to go to tiktok, here’s a frame extracted from the video:
Note, this was in Alexandra Headland in Queensland in Australia. So no idea why the article cites Georgia law…
Also this is relevant: https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/road-safety/mobile-phones
Illegal mobile phone use while driving includes:
- holding it in your hand
- resting on any part of your body (eg. your lap or shoulder)
If you hold your phone or have it on your body, you will be fined even if you’re not operating the phone, or it’s turned off.
Slop. Real rowers weren’t set up to spin the ship in circles.
If you don’t recognise her name, she played Joan of Arcadia.
That still didn’t tell me anything, but for others maybe this: She played Martha M. Masters in House M.D.
lol their stupid “key takeaway” section contains a made up a mention of thieves, that aren’t anywhere else in the article.
In Tokyo haben die echt solche Würfel, allerdings nach oben offen.
I have that at work. Some will talk about how they dealt with the liberalisation of the telecom market in Switzerland, and I’m sitting there thinking “I was in kindergarten at the time”. One who retired two years ago was at the company starting from the year before I was born.
Edit: And I’m not even represented by Daniel Radcliffe in the picture lol. 1.5 years ago a zoomer joined us, and it’s also been fun to not be the youngest.
Oh shit sorry. And thanks for the correction. I guess the other thing isn’t through yet, then. All I can find is that the coalition agreed to it with each other.
Today it went through parliament for real.
do they think that Nigel’s running a cunning stunt
This is deliberate, isn’t it? He wants people to think “Nigel’s a stunning cunt”? Good one
Ah I thought it was all the same location and stopped searching after the first 😁 thanks for the edit!
I don’t really get how the fig leaf of “due to data-centers” is even supposed to work.
They get more demand, so more revenue. Then the fixed costs of the business are spread over more revenue, which is supposed to make the prices better not worse.
I know the profit motive is just extracting whatever the market will bear, but could anyone still explain the reasoning they are trying to make customers believe?
If anyone’s wondering that’s Guangzhou South.
Looks very impressive, but also pretty airport-like. I think I prefer the look of Frankfurt or Zürich, which operate on a similar scale (all three at around 170 million passengers a year).
Of course there is way different railway history behind those. Making it look retro would also have been weird for Guangzhou South I would think.
What the fuck.
The concept of dignity is really not dependent on religious foundations. In fact isn’t the modern concept of human dignity mostly a result of enlightenment philosophy. You know, from the guys who left religious though behind? And that later developed into the concept of animal dignity?
Also it isn’t - as a rule - a common atheistic concept that humans are “above” animals, that’s one is a Christian original.