- 1.92K Posts
- 92 Comments
Pro@programming.devOPto Technology@lemmy.world•Why is the manosphere on the rise? UN Women sounds the alarm over online misogynyEnglish38·1 day agoSo… What exactly is your definition of what should be posted in the technology community?
Pro@programming.devto Technology@lemmy.world•Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on XEnglish31·2 days agoArticle Date: February 13, 2025
Numerous studies have reported an increase in hate speech on X (formerly Twitter) in the months immediately following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform on October 27th, 2022; relatedly, despite Musk’s pledge to “defeat the spam bots,” a recent study reported no substantial change in the concentration of inauthentic accounts. However, it is not known whether any of these trends endured. We address this by examining material posted on X from the beginning of 2022 through June 2023, the period that includes Musk’s full tenure as CEO. We find that the increase in hate speech just before Musk bought X persisted until at least May of 2023, with the weekly rate of hate speech being approximately 50% higher than the months preceding his purchase, although this increase cannot be directly attributed to any policy at X. The increase is seen across multiple dimensions of hate, including racism, homophobia, and transphobia. Moreover, there is a doubling of hate post “likes,” indicating increased engagement with hate posts. In addition to measuring hate speech, we also measure the presence of inauthentic accounts on the platform; these accounts are often used in spam and malicious information campaigns. We find no reduction (and a possible increase) in activity by these users after Musk purchased X, which could point to further negative outcomes, such as the potential for scams, interference in elections, or harm to public health campaigns. Overall, the long-term increase in hate speech, and the prevalence of potentially inauthentic accounts, are concerning, as these factors can undermine safe and democratic online environments, and increase the risk of offline harms.
Pro@programming.devOPto Technology@lemmy.world•Why is the manosphere on the rise? UN Women sounds the alarm over online misogynyEnglish122·2 days agoAm I tripping, out of touch with reality? These people really don’t seem to understand the problem
How so? Can you explain what do you mean here exactly?
Pro@programming.devOPto Technology@lemmy.world•Russia prepares to get rid of WhatsApp and possibly Telegram: Parliament passed a law pertaining to a national messaging appEnglish4·3 days agoNot using it even with a gun pointed at my head.
Why? You can use it to send messages to random numbers till the gun is pointed elsewhere.
Pro@programming.devMto Technology@programming.dev•How an Unknown Chinese Phonemaker Took Over AfricaEnglish1·4 days agoThis post had been removed. Paywalls are not allowed. Please check the rules.
Pro@programming.devMto Technology@programming.dev•New code in Spotify’s app references the long-awaited ‘lossless’ tierEnglish1·4 days agoHi, this post had been removed as TechCrunch is blacklisted. Please checkout the rules.
Pro@programming.devOPto Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world•Artists Protesting AI is Dumb.English1·5 days agodeleted by creator
Pro@programming.devOPto Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world•Artists Protesting AI is Dumb.English14·5 days agothey’re just going to lower the quality of their products.
Great, you as user of the service/ product can make your choice to not deal with companies that use AI.
The rest of users can enjoy more choices as they might simply prefer AI.
AI in the strict sense doesn’t exist yet.
WTF?
Pro@programming.devOPto Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world•Artists Protesting AI is Dumb.English35·5 days agoMy dude, don’t put words in my mouth.
I said Protesting AI is dumb , not all protesting is dumb.
Also, when did protesting AI had actually worked to achieve real improvement?
Pro@programming.devOPto Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world•Artists Protesting AI is Dumb.English15·5 days ago2 things: AI is wider than LLMs and if you were even remotely correct then artists and writers would not protest it at all.
Pro@programming.devOPto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Can you advocate for privacy by showing it? Does it work or will people never learn privacy in practice?English2·5 days agoOne problem I see in your way of thought here, adblock use among social media users will never reach 100%.
Furthermore, adblockers are getting weaker with Google Chrome MV3. All of this leads to the logical conclusion in my eyes that you can only change the sources that power users use which will eventually lead to better privacy for all people involved. You will never be able to control people setups to be super private.
Pro@programming.devOPto Technology@lemmy.world•Meta rolled back protections. Now hate is surging - What we're seeing: More hate, more fear, less freedom.English82·6 days agoSaid that on Social Media
Pro@programming.devto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What chat app do you recommend? DeMETAingEnglish4·7 days agoOlvid, for people close to me. Signal for strangers.
Pro@programming.devto Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•A way to pirate the only fans content of ANYONEEnglish4·12 days agoWhat. The. Fuck. Are You Talking About?
Pro@programming.devOPtocryptocurrency@monero.town•BiT Global drops antitrust lawsuit against CoinbaseEnglish1·13 days ago??
Pro@programming.devOPto Technology@lemmy.world•Telegram, the FSB, and the Man in the Middle: The technical infrastructure that underpins Telegram is controlled by a man whose companies have collaborated with Russian intelligence services.English15·13 days agoYes, they are even republished by OCCRP.
Pro@programming.devOPto AskUSA@discuss.online•Who do you think will win in the coming civil war and why?English41·14 days agoHow so?
Original Source: Could lighting be the new gambling regulator?