Yep, also he doesnt just stop with children, teenagers and adults also go into the mix.

That is the majority of people, indoctrination runs deep. Pro birth is just a naive take to further separate and reinforce the patriarchy.

And thats the motto of the world: authoritarianism.

Yes and no, while there is a chance of causing harm to others while on drugs more succinct and beneficial procedures exist. I also dont think its such an unpopular opinion as you think it is - as efforts in actually helping drug addicts is quite small worldwide.

Prostitution has barely any say in this case, majority of the situation involved straight up rape.

Also identifying it as solely child rape is only the tip of the iceberg, as they involved different people of different ages including teens and young adults.

To be fair, this kind of behaviour is a product of constant indoctrination - always stowed away. A social science such as this should be introduced and taught in schools.

Agreed, some things are logical enough to see that; however, a study does help out in a way - reinforcing the common knowledge.

I can certainly understand, it has an abstract, minimalist appeal - however, its safety or its basic features aren’t as appealing.

What if you owned: weed/drugs, illegal firearms, items which could be used for potential murder, negative opinions about the fascist government?

This argument is shallow to the point where fascism is what you’re advocating here for. So what, if you did own something thats not law abiding - without any credible proof there is nothing there, and non of anybody’s interest.

I dont think the word “pedophilia” really means what it supossed to mean in this case.

only a small portion of total kms traveled

Thats doesnt really prove anything, the fuel burn is at its peak during take off and landing since it requires a lot of force to actually lift up. On the contrary, sustain flight is very efficient.

Shorter distances isnt a valid excuse - in fact, it is the direct problem you’re seemingly defending.

Relative to how busses are more efficient to cars and how in general public modes of transport are much more effective than riding a massive tin can all by yourself.

Because its all snake oil thats based on nothing. It will always be 13-18 as this is the area they can get away with - teenagers will be the sacrificial lamb where all the focus will be brought towards children.

But why are teenagers included? Because they have greater ambitions than just children. And every one of these states has their own fascist strategy for totalitarianism.

A ban for children (& teenagers) is a ban to privacy for everyone.

What the hell are you even talking about? This really reads like a troll comment more than anything.

convicted paedophile

He is a convicted rapist not just a “paedophile”. Paedophilia is a mental condition - and we are way past that - so why spread nonsence such as “convicted paedophile” when in fact we’re talking about a sex offender/rapist.

I feel you. To help, there is tools on Lemmy which aid you with trauma or content you find troublesome. Filters are a great way to adjust your feed to rule out stuff just like this; there are also specific blocks you can do such as community blocks ❤️.

Its really such a poor choice of words. Why try to invent new words for the exact same thing? The only thing that comes to mind in this case is strategic manipulation.

Agreed, the reality is that he raped everyone that was available. Children weren’t the sole victim - in the sake of this post, it was a teenager that was the victim which illustrates how wide spread this is.

And that argument is probably ragebait, which that other person has fallen into.

Nothing. One person talks shit, while the other sells a strawman to “prove a point”. Both are shit people.