• 17 Posts
  • 2.41K Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2025

help-circle





  • So you’re reduced to playing semantic games and trying to claim I’m a liar.

    I’m not playing games. It’s not an objective word. You’re making shit up.

    You’re continuing to mischaracterize the difficulty involved in installing things on a Linux system.

    You’re evidently walking back your claim that there are distros/package managers that lack a graphical package manager.

    Brother, you already answered your own question in the same comment where you asked for it. I’m not sure what you’re looking for here.

    And you continue to stubbornly refuse to elaborate any of your points unless I pull it out of you.

    You’ve already demonstrated in your own comments what I said previously: You already know what the issues are, you just refuse to acknowledge them as issues.



  • It is miniscule, objectively.

    If it was “objective” you could point to a number. “Miniscule” is simply not an objective word. Lying again. 2% is not miniscule.

    The alternatives aren’t inferior

    If they weren’t inferior no one would be paying hundreds of dollars a month for Adobe.

    DaVinci Resolve

    LOL have you ever tried to install this on Linux? It’s an absolute nightmare. But it is a great example of yet another piece of software that’s not installable from a package manager so thanks for elaborating on my point.

    Can you share some distros/package managers that don’t have a GUI available?

    We’ve already had this discussion…

    Can you share some distros intended for desktop use that don’t come with a graphical package manager?

    Is Arch not intended for desktop use?

    Is that the experience you’re basing this whole opinion on?

    No.







  • artyom@piefed.socialtoLinux@programming.devI don't get why they're okay with this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    53 minutes ago

    the number of people that actually require an Adobe product is miniscule compared to the number of PC users, so it’s an extreme edge case

    1. It is not miniscule.
    2. It’s called an example.

    Alternatives like…exist

    Those are simply not an option for actual professionals. There are expectations in film and photo industries.

    Can you share some distros/package managers that don’t have a GUI available?

    Hell, even Arch has options for graphical package managers

    Every distro has “options” for everything. If they don’t come packaged with the installer then what point do they serve? How are you going to install it? You’re answering your own questions and yet still unable to understand what the problem is.

    I have Nobara installed on another desktop. I forget what the package manager GUI on that one is called, but it was very similarly easy to use

    Nobara is the one I was referring to with multiple package managers that were completely unintuitive, had constant update notifications, and eventually broke my install.






  • artyom@piefed.socialtoLinux@programming.devI don't get why they're okay with this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    It is that easy…if that program is in your repository. If Adobe products are in your package manager, please share with the class, because we’d all love to see it.

    And if your distro even has a graphical package manager (and only 1 of them), especially an easy to use one. Many times it either isn’t in there or doesn’t even exist for Linux.

    Again, there’s no way you’ve actually used Linux and don’t know this. That’s how I know you’re lying.

    Go back and answer my question, you don’t get to dodge that just to stir up more BS here.