Is your for specific fire department actually showing up to town halls protesting that or have we been spending a little too much time on the internet lately?

Especially since one appears to have an Axon Body 3/4 on their right shoulder and the other one has done other brand on their center chest

Yeah, there’s clearly demand, so the engineering challenge is making them difficult to detect. That’s how the OEMs are going to view this

Welcome to Costco I love you

Beware that is this a vibe coded Claude app, unclear if any of the information is remotely accurate, especially given that the underlying AIS data is being spoofed and manipulated by pretty much everyone in the region

Look at us we’re so dangerous OwO better watch out!

I’ve worked directly with some startup founders and they tend to not understand selection bias very thoroughly. Rather, they see themselves as inherently smarter than other people and eventually they determine that all the decisions they make must be the right ones. Even when their success is very obviously luck they eventually start to think as of they have an infallibility field around them which drives some extremely odd behaviors.

Yeah, for people who aren’t in the gun hobby space, Bloomberg in particular is really weird about guns. I’m not talking like effective ways of reducing violence, he’s constantly throwing money at pushing Kafkaesque regulations like this. His general strategy seems to be trying to reduce violent crime by making as much random unrelated stuff an arrestable offense as possible to the point where it (surprise) just makes it easier for cops to continue the cycle in low income communities.

My boss only makes eye contact when he’s picking his nose

I guarantee that number is waaaaaaay higher. They openly talk about misusing their other database tools for that all the time

I feel like I’ve eaten way more watermelons than I’ve vaporized

Chatgpt, make this sound intellectual: <diary vomit>

In fairness, I care less about why people [redacted] and more that people just succeed at [redacted]

AI slop

That’s not how…what???

F = G * (m1 * m2) / r^2

Note that radius is both squared and the dividing term. More distance = less gravity

Fuck copper there’s literally two pounds of lithium in each one

Marketing

Legitimately, how does one actually hold the bottom one without scorching your fingers?

This is a hard one to debate because “a number of jobs” isn’t really a statement you can counter. Yeah it’ll probably replace somebody, the question is how significant will the impact be and will those people be able to get other jobs/will any jobs be created by it. Currently it seems to be creating far more jobs than it’s costing, mostly just building places to put servers.

What you’re probably looking for: Generative models are just an algorithm, arguably even a fairly simple one. We’re already seeing the limits of how far we can push the current paradigm of model structures so without a big change in how they work things may stagnate. The problem with the current state of the art is that the average person can, if not always specifically call out generative model output, definitely note the mediocre quality. The most promising use case is writing certain types of code because it’s repetitive and predictable in structure, but even there they reliably barf on moderately complex tasks where you can’t easily let them run forever closed loop (as in, they can’t self-test the program because it generates output that isn’t text). Most other use cases fare far worse so if we’re not seeing mass software layoffs I’m not convinced we’ll see much damage elsewhere.

The only other case where one could argue it’s truly all-powerful is scams because the scams deliberately target the bottom of the bell curve already and the models just make it easier to automate. So, does putting scammer foot soldiers out of a job count?

You guys were getting bones?