Yeah, if my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is too far for them, they’re not fighting for anything worth backing.

Oh, there’s definitely a logic to it. They just lie and make up rationalizations, when in reality it’s as simple as you’re an out group and deserve punishment for that.

Wait till you find out how the runtime manages multiple concurrent timers

Well they couldn’t be in a circle if “more evil gay” is referring to a total ordering, as the word “more” usually implies. So at the very least it must be an infinite chain of gay people. However, there’s no condition that there’s only one gay person standing behind, so we may still have an infinite directed acyclic graph of gay people behind you >:3

I’m theoretically bi but practically lesbian, I prefer to say lesbian because it communicates an idea closer to the truth. I’m sure people could say I’m technically not lesbian or technically not bi, and to those people I ask wtf they think the purpose of words are.

I’d say it’s fine and that people should expect such a simple term to not fully capture people.

I take daily amphetamines :3

(I have ADHD)

Straight men are attracted to more than one women and therefore they’re attracted to people who aren’t their wife, so they must be cheating!

I did find myself over a very long time and it turns out “myself” oscillates between several different points uncontrollably and I somehow think that’s not gonna be considered an acceptable answer.

But if that evil person is gay that means they have an eviler gay person behind them too! It’s gay all the way down.

I guess lesbian and black women are next to be kicked out because some bigots are scared of them in the women’s toilet. But there’s no law against female convicted sex offenders using the toilet for the safety of others, strange… almost as if it’s not about supposed safety from “dangerous” people.

Oh yeah, had that happen once. The nausea of seeing blood pour out was worse than the pain of the needle.

It’s normal where I live for students to say that. You can argue with that, but then I’d say it’s not worth singling out one person.

You sure you’re not just oversensitized to it? This feels like a false positive.

I didn’t get the impression reading that that they’re presenting themselves as an intellectual or a researcher, just that they’re a nerd going down rabbit holes.

omg it’s my personality 🤩

Everyone I argue online with is a Smurf?

“which one?”

Other FOSS people don’t tend to get loads of money from Cloudflare or all this attention for what’s not even that interesting a project.

The Ladybird project is also run by someone who’s said some bad things but it hasn’t exploded in popularity or received 6 figures in corporate donations. Something feels off about this Omarchy hype… like, the product isn’t even that amazing, so the only thing I imagine could explain this difference is that it’s DHH doing it.

Can it find my level? I lost it 🥺

Am I not allowed to take risks purely to improve my life rather than to make it less bad? I suppose then that most people shouldn’t be allowed to become pregnant because it’s a risk that’s not fixing a specific bad thing.

It’s disappointing how quickly liberty goes out the window for minorities in the name of “safety” or “what’s best” for them.