cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/15781466

Am I out of touch?

No, it’s the forward-thinking generation of software engineers that want elegant, reliable, declarative systems that are wrong.

  • F04118F
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Yes you’re right. Unofficial Flatpaks aren’t ideal and pose a security risk. Just like many convenience workarounds for apps that aren’t officially packaged, such as COPR, PPAs, AUR and the always great curl https://github.com/dev/repo/main/install.sh | bash. Not having a convenient way to install or update is a security risk too of course. You’ll probably end up with outdated software.

    But both Flatpaks and the Wayland desktop have a focus on sandboxing as a security measure, and when implemented properly (official verified flatpak / app that uses the Wayland API), they can both increase security. In practice, yes, the weakest link is the problem of course. Hopefully soon, the vast majority of Linux apps will run either native Wayland or as flatpaks and that will significantly decrease the attack surface for the Linux desktop.