• UnanimousStargazer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s not an AUTOMATIC disqualification, it still needs to be adjudicated

    I might have mistaken what was written, but the scholars in the paper explicitly point out section 3 is ‘self-executing’. ~Which means it does not require adjuducation.~ I was mistaken, see comment below.

    If it happened before, that doesn’t mean it was necessary.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Self-executing” there means that the Constitutional prohibition doesn’t require Congress to pass a law on the subject.

      Some Constitutional provisions do require Congressional action to take effect. For instance, the income tax is authorized by the Sixteenth Amendment, but the amendment does not itself create an income tax; it just tells Congress that it may do so.

      (The original Constitution did not allow an income tax, because it expected the federal government to fund itself from tariffs and from tax assessments from the states, which were required to be proportional to population.)