• helenslunch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The “nazi gun control supported the holocaust” argument has been debunked

    No, it hasn’t. Several people have provided their opinions on the matter. Certainly biased opinions. It can’t be “debunked” with anything less than a time machine and a militia the size that would make the NRA blush.

    Frtuermore, gun control supporters of today are not the same as NAZI gun control supporters - who disarmed Jews.

    Doesn’t matter if they’re the same or not. Only thing that matters is whether the people are disarmed. Regimes change.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      The fucking 1% of Germans who were jewish, who were forcefully disarmed were not going to avoid getting genocided by remaining armed or trying to purchase more arms.

      • helenslunch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes. They would. And they killed more than the jews, you know? About 40% we’re non-Jewish.

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          “… It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population.” - Alan E. Steinweis, NYT Source

          Your arguments so far are that people saying this are obviously biased. If we assume those persecuted could have gained firearms, armed themselves and formed a highly organized militia - all while facing road blocks at each and every turn - do you really think this militia could have kept a genocide from occurring?