There’s this rising narrative going around that if you ask specifically for a CIS partner, you’re a transphobe. That could be true for some people but it’s not fundamentally related to bigotry. Moreover, this narrative, the “if you only want a CIS mate then that is prejudice” is trampling on one of the most important rights a person can have: the right to choose who they want to get intimate with.

First of all, transmen are in fact men and transwomen are in fact women. Let’s get that out of the way. This isn’t a foot in the door for “trans this really isn’t that” narratives. What this is about it is the freedom to choose who you want to be intimate with. That right is sancrosanct, it is absolutely inviolable.

And yes, there’s plenty of issues that make transgender dating a special issue. If someone reveals their TG status they can be open to hate crimes and even deadly violence. However all marginalized groups are special in their own way. As a black man I don’t think it’s racist if a woman says she doesn’t want to date a black man. I face oppression, too. My class is special in its own way. One group isn’t more special than the other. None of us have the right to force ourselves upon those who don’t want to be intimate with us, even by omitting who we really are.

Really, if you have to deceive or hide who you are in order to date someone, do you really want to date them? I wouldn’t. That’s not fair to you and you’re denying them their right to choose who they want. What do you think will happen when the person wants a CIS mate and they discover the truth? They’re going to get pissed and dump you. Now you have to shame them into staying with you: “If you loved me for real this wouldn’t bother you”… that’s not going to convince anyone. They’re either going to leave, or they’ll resent you forever. That’s just how it is. You can be mad at that but that’s about as effective as protesting the rising of the sun. There’s just no way to win once you’ve gone down that road.

“I want a CIS mate” is not the same as “trans women are not women” - one is a preference, the other is harmful prejudice. On the flip side CIS people who do date trans people shouldn’t be shamed for their choices either. A man should be free to date a trans woman and not catch flak about it. Trans people should be able to be openly trans and not face hate speech or threats to their well-being. This, without any exception whatsoever.

The fundamental fact is when you shame or worse abrogate people’s right to choose who they want to get intimate with, it’s not going to end well for you. All you’re going to get is people who resent being coerced or bullied to date people they don’t want to. And that’s not something the country, or the world, will ever put up with. Except that right now, most people don’t imagine they can be labeled a transphobe just for wanting a CIS mate. And unpopular opinion: that should be nipped in the bud.

  • yarr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    So I’m confronted with the reality that if I want to believe trans women are women, I shouldn’t be able to hold my second opinion, but it feels like one that can’t budge.

    You called yourself out.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m not calling myself out, I’m exploring a personal facet.

      I believe picking a mate is a 100% choice environment. I personally (as the subject of the example) am seeking a bio, cis woman.

      The point of the thread is how to indicate your mate preference without being hurtful.

      I dont think it’s bigoted to not seek a transgender mate, but am open to conversation on that. I can understand putting a “no trans” label on a profile can seem hurtful, even when the intention is anything but.

      Your second statement (except for when I’m choosing a mate) seems reasonable. Is it not?

      I’m not degrading trans women, I’m simply specifying the particulars of my search, which goes beyond “trans women are women”

      • yarr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I personally (as the subject of the example) am seeking a bio, cis woman.

        Ah, so you’re saying “no trans”

        I can understand putting a “no trans” label on a profile can seem hurtful

        Yes, people will feel excluded by this

        I’m not degrading trans women

        Correct, you are just saying that they aren’t sexually attractive to you and you assign higher sexual market value to cis women and that you see trans women and cis women as different

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          And shouldn’t everyone individually assess their own "sexual market value"s, and be free to do so?

          This is an “own” valuation, you aren’t valuing a whole group of people as “less than” you’re just valuing your own matches.

          It’s not that I’m too good for any one in particular, just looking for certain varieties of humans to date

          • yarr
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            5 months ago

            And shouldn’t everyone individually assess their own "sexual market value"s, and be free to do so?

            Yes

            > “A and B are equal. However, I only prefer A. Why do people that enjoy A and B think I am being discriminatory towards B?”

            • chetradley@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s a huge logical leap you’re making , that sexual preference equates to having a higher opinion of one group over another. Is a gay man being discriminatory towards all women?

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Again is the position of the speaker in your hanging question wrong/bigoted?

              In my opinion not.

              Perhaps shortsighted, overconcerned with others, but not bigoted

              • yarr
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                5 months ago

                His preference for cis women is 100% earnest. What is dishonest is “I believe thing A and B are equal, but prefer A only”. That indicates that either they are not equal, or he is not being honest about his preference.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  But is an “equal in society” and “equal in my personal mate search” really in conflict? I say no.

                • shani66@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  How? Thinking you can’t have a preference without a hierarchy is incredibly conservative nonsense