• helenslunch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    No, they didn’t.

    Yes. They did.

    The point that were made all stated that everything’s protected by free speech.

    Yes, I got that. My point (once again) is no one thinks it is illegal, which makes the argument it a strawman (ie: arguing against a point no one is making).

    No one here is upset about the Black National Anthem being sung

    Oh look, another strawman.

    Ergo, DON’T MAKE IT A THING.

    I’m really not sure what this is supposed to mean in this context. I didn’t “make it a thing”. It was “made a thing” by whoever decided to sing it, the people who were upset by it, the article that was published, and the person replying to the article before I even knew it took place.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oh look, someone trying to stir up a dumb argument on the internet because they need attention.

      • helenslunch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. 🤦‍♂️ It’s definitely not that someone had a bad take. Deny deny deny.

        • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, that’s definitely what’s happening. I need attention from anonymous strangers on the internet.

          ooh look, another strawman argument. strawman arguments all over the place today!

          • helenslunch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think you understand what that means

            • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              I understand perfectly. It means this is not a thing, and you never should have tried to make it one.

                • Pratai@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Are you actively trying to give us an example of what MAGA outrage actually looks like? Because from here, reading your rants…. You’re coming off like a very upset Trump supporter.

                  • helenslunch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    You replied to a comment with a laughing emoji and insist that I’m “outraged”? Look at yourself bud.