Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

  • potustheplant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok so you’re saying that women used to be discriminated and that (thankfully) is no longer the case. Why would it be ok for the opposite to happen? Both things are wrong and that “eye for an eye” mentality benefits no one.

    • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I do agree both things are wrong. Meaning discrimination.

      I think one person’s art in this case might be described as another person’s stunt.

      Edit, as for whether it’s beneficial, not sure. I guess we’ll see.