The question above for the most part, been reading up on it. Also want to it for learning purposes.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thank you!!

      If you don’t want your devices to be accessible from the internet, you want a firewall. Treating NAT like a firewall is a bad idea.

      • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        But still, if I understand correctly, with NAT you can just use one firewall for your router and with IPv6 you’d need a firewall for each of your devices. This seems like a lot more to manage, right? But maybe I still don’t understand the concept of IPv6.

        Edit: Apparently I don’t understand the concept of IPv6.

        • gedhrel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s not correct, but it shouldn’t preclude you from applying defence in depth.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Firewall and NAT are separate concepts. You can still have a firewall on your router when using IPv6. I don’t know how many consumer-grade routers handle it well though.