• Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not like threatening the writers’ kids would have been reasonable either

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wouldn’t expect logical thinking to be a strong characteristic in someone who’d threaten kids over a videogame.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              OK, so let’s assume that’s a good faith literal interpretation.

              Let’s try it this way.

              Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren’t generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

              I could however be wrong in this generalisation given I only have my experience to go on, if your experience leads you to believe people who threaten kids over videogames are not running with a logic deficit then your statement makes sense I suppose.

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So, not a good faith take then, oh well.

                  “Logical” is not a binary position. It’s a spectrum.

                  Agreed, not sure how it’s relevant but it seems we agree on something after all.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think different people have different reasons for disliking it.

        For me it’s the writing. Specifically: the first half does it very best to make you hate a specific character, then the the second half has you play that character. I get what the writers were trying to do. The problem I have with it that is doesn’t make for a fun game. I don’t want to play a character I hate.

        The writers were so intent on making a specific point that they forgot that they were making a video game. A video game is different from e.g. a movie in that the player is a part of the story, they take on the role of the character they are playing.

        For this to work there has to be some part of the character the player can identify with. When playing Ellie, the player can identify with the rage she’s feeling. For Abby, there’s nothing to identify with. She’s mad that Joel killed her father but Joel was entirely justified in killing him. Her father was a bad person and deserved to die.

        It makes it very hard for me to put myself in her shoes. As a result I just didn’t enjoy playing as her and quit the game after realizing that it wasn’t just a short section but the entire second half of the game.

          • Someusernamehuh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t care about abby and her physical appearance, my issue was purely the santa Barbara section. Had the game ended before that started it would have been fine. By then ellie was fine leaving abby alive as killing abbys friends had not helped her process the death of Joel. They just extended the story for no reason and it made it worse

          • potustheplant
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            The ending doesn’t make sense at all but ok. You do you.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Consider the average person’s intelligence. Then realize half (or so) are stupider than that.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a couple of actors in my province that had a hard time finding work after playing a certain role because people were mad at them personally and producers didn’t want to touch them with a 10’ pole!

    • Willie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because writing has no face, you can’t show writing how much you hate it, because it doesn’t change and has no feelings. Meanwhile an actor does. It’s just stupid emotional stuff.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      TBF, she did go on a tirad against players when the game was getting ciriticized. I found it weird that she took the criticism of the game’s writing so personally despite her not being one of the writers.

      Keep in mind that I’m not excusing the death theats. That shit isn’t okay. I’m just pointing out why she may have been targeted for harassment.