Mex@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 year agoA quarter of Brits want a ban on fake grasswww.thisismoney.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down111
arrow-up1144arrow-down1external-linkA quarter of Brits want a ban on fake grasswww.thisismoney.co.ukMex@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoIt can be useful. It’s a great surface for doing any form of outdoor exercise on.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoPretty absurd to pretend any of its uses come close to outweighing the negatives.
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoClaiming it’s “not actually useful” though is just wrong.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoIf a thing does more harm than good, it isn’t useful, the people using it are just selfish.
minus-squareRokk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s an interesting new definition of ‘useful’ you have.
minus-squareMostlyBirds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s certainly more sound than yours, which apparently requires nothing more than “it feels kinds of nice to step on” while it poisons the ground and eliminates yet more of your local ecosystem.
It can be useful. It’s a great surface for doing any form of outdoor exercise on.
Pretty absurd to pretend any of its uses come close to outweighing the negatives.
Claiming it’s “not actually useful” though is just wrong.
If a thing does more harm than good, it isn’t useful, the people using it are just selfish.
That’s an interesting new definition of ‘useful’ you have.
It’s certainly more sound than yours, which apparently requires nothing more than “it feels kinds of nice to step on” while it poisons the ground and eliminates yet more of your local ecosystem.