• bane_killgrind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe if you want to piss off the farmer…

    You are forgetting that there is a component of anonymity that fiat currency provides transactions. You lose that in a social economy.

    Money is “asocial”.

          • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah

            Just like in the existing capitalist economy, case managers decide who receives disability payments and insurance analysts decide who gets medical treatment. Who knew society means being at the whims of other people 🤡

            Is a social economy, you can directly appeal to people with resources you want, as in “socialize”.

              • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Man I don’t know, why don’t you go ask this hypothetical man in this hypothetical society? Don’t be a dick if you expect to be welcomed.

                • drphungky@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I’m asking you because you’re in here arguing for this moneyless, library society! I feel like if we can’t answer super basic questions about how getting rid of something as universally important as currency would actually work, then maybe we haven’t really thought it through.

                  Very interested to hear more though, particularly as someone who studied things like this and is now an economist who works in inflation.