I have tried out Gnome, KDE, Lxqt and Xfce on a regular desktop and all of them feel nice. I haven’t tried many DE’s on a laptop.
Are there any particular DE’s you like on a laptop, because of things like power consumption and efficiency that would not come normally into consideration for a desktop?

  • hfdh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    DE: KDE & Cinnamon. WM: Awesome & I3

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you haven’t tried them, I recommend giving them a try. They all have something to offer.

    I don’t use Gnome, for example. People knock on it a bit BUT a large group of people swear by it for workflow.

    KDE Plasma is the dream for anyone who likes to tweak settings. I used it on my laptop for a long time and it is very convenient. It also manages power and monitor settings very well. In terms of memory usage it is now similar to XFCE.

    XFCE is perfect for people who don’t like change. It is a slow moving DE; tried and true.

    Right now I am using LXQt. Not sure why I decided to do that. It looks ok. It is fast and light. That’s it’s claim to fame. It can be used with different WMs which is nice.

    Are there any particular DE’s you like on a laptop, because of things like power consumption and efficiency that would not come normally into consideration for a desktop?

    I can’t say I’ve ever looked into it. But, I found that KDE handled things very well. I used my laptop for full workdays, getting 11 hours out of it.

    • aMalayali@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you.

      If you haven’t tried them, I recommend giving them a try. They all have something to offer.

      I have tried them on desktop and in most cases, I did not have any serious issue with them. I was thinking which one would be better optimised for laptops.

      KDE handled things very well

      I’m on KDE now. It’s good. Was thinking whether there are any DE’s that are specifically recommended for laptops, for efficiency or ease of use.

    • CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I started with ubuntu then mint on desktop and then vm. I hated Gnome in those days, prefering KDE or XFCE (even i3wm). Now that my laptop is on EOS, I tried Gnome again and it’s much better for use with a trackpad. So yeah, different DEs for different tastes/uses/systems.

    • pendsv@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have nothing against gnome and it’s defiantly the most polished, but in the same time it has alot of small inconveniences that are only fixable with plugins and messing around with the settings.

      For my workflow kde is usable out of the box with almost no configurations.

  • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    KDE

    If there was a modern Window Maker, I would use that. I mean with a notification area and when I minimize Firefox or Chrome I don’t get five icons in the corner and it works as a Wayland compositor and supports HiDPI scaling.

  • lpslucasps@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a KDE guy and use it myself on my notebook, but GNOME with its multitouch gestures and polished (if a little inflexible) workflow is also an excellent fit.

  • konodas@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tiling window managers like i3 are imho nice for laptops, since they do not waste any space and can be easily controllen via keyboard. Takes a while to get used to them, however.

    • snauth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i3wm on my laptop, light on resources, keyboard-driven saves screen estate (no window decorations), and picom makes it easy on the eyes (rounded corners, shadows). If you prefer wayland, sway (and swayfx) is the way.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went with i3 (i3wm) instead of a full DE on my debian laptop. I wanted to minimize trackpad use without requiring peripherals (like a mouse).

    On one hand it’s highly performant and easily configurable; on the other hand, it does lead to problems that I wouldn’t have known about with a DE—for example, I had screen tearing for months until I learned I needed a compositor, which doesn’t come included.

    In other words: it is a very barebones OOBE, and requires a lot of setup and RTFM (it’s probably in the user guide that i need a compositor), but the reward of higher performance/lower power draw, easily configuring the hell out of it, smoothly navigating everywhere with the keyboard alone, and reclaiming screenspace from taskbars and titlebars has made it my preferred setup (even on desktop).

    Tangential to the question, but my “no mouse” ethic has taken considerable effort to learn the cli way of dealing with configuration that is trivialized by GUIs (e.g. volume and wifi, i’m still struggling with bluetooth and rtorrent), but it’s made the experience of working on a laptop 500% more enjoyable and less of an uphill struggle against the trackpad, and it doesn’t require a flat surface for a mouse.

  • okiloki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently switched from i3 to hyprland and quite like it. Wayland still has some issues, but the better scaling makes it worth it.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m the weirdo over in the corner using TDE (Trinity Desktop Environment, forked from KDE3) on both my desktop and laptop.