alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 maanden geledenLula da Silva keeps his promise: Amazon deforestation reduced by 64%thebetter.newsexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1338arrow-down16cross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eenoticias@lemmy.eco.brgoodnews@kbin.social
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkLula da Silva keeps his promise: Amazon deforestation reduced by 64%thebetter.newsalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 maanden geledenmessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eenoticias@lemmy.eco.brgoodnews@kbin.social
minus-squareemmanuel_car@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 maanden geledenOr the rate of reforestation must be greater than the rate of deforestation.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 maanden geledenI assumed the deforestation was a net measurement to begin with. Good point though, maybe I shouldn’t have.
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 maanden geledenThat ignores the complexity of forests, however (and not just your comment). Young forests aren’t nearly as diverse, it takes a long time for the complexity to come back. Otherwise we would just plant shitty pine trees everywhere (a terrible idea!)
Or the rate of reforestation must be greater than the rate of deforestation.
I assumed the deforestation was a net measurement to begin with. Good point though, maybe I shouldn’t have.
That ignores the complexity of forests, however (and not just your comment).
Young forests aren’t nearly as diverse, it takes a long time for the complexity to come back. Otherwise we would just plant shitty pine trees everywhere (a terrible idea!)