• HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man,

    You are amazing. I wouln’t have had the patience to have that conversation.

    Thank you for explaining people… well… Reality.

    Just a bit of an off topic point:

    I belive the use of “socialism” that the other comenter has is am apropiation or integration of socialisim into the kyriarchy. Defusing and making solcialism anti-revolutionary, taking away what it makes it dangerous and leaving a shell of it self.

    Socialism is not anymore the controll of the means of production by the workers (simplify definition) but capitalism where they controlling group give you a bit of assurance and you have to thank them for it.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks! I just take combating bourgeois nonsense seriously when I see it.

      You’re correct, by adopting good, common sense social safety nets as “socialism,” Socialism becomes defanged. “We already have Socialism, why do you want any more?” Can become a cry against the Proletariat.