Schill said France could engage a division of 20,000 troops within 30 days to operate as part of an allied coalition. Paris, he added, would be able to command a force of around 60,000 soldiers made up of French and other allied troops. The French army comprises some 121,000 soldiers, with 24,000 reservists.

  • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 months ago

    This coming from the same France that was too chickenshit to intervene to reverse the Niger coup that evicted the French from one of their most important neo-colonies. Excuse me if i don’t take their threats too seriously… I’ll believe it when i see it.

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bit of a different situation, methinks. AFAIK to get ot Niger, they’d have to fly across Algerian airspace - which Algeria has closed for military aircraft. To get to Ukraine, they’d have to move across Germany and Poland - both of which are in NATO and will likely be of assistance.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Moving a military through all of Europe towards Russia… where have we seen that before?

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They may as well call it doing a Hobbit, because every time they tried that they went There And Back Again. After Napoleon tried it Russian troops ended up in Paris, after Hitler tried it Soviet troops ended up in Berlin. Do they somehow hope third time’s the charm? Doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results is usually not a sign of sanity.

    • Munrock@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a good opportunity for a stakeholder analysis.

      When you tabulate who stands to benefit and who stands to lose from French troops being deployed to Niger compared to being deployed to Ukraine, it’s very obvious that the French government serves the interests of groups other than the French people, or even itself.

    • Navaryn@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      For real, western nations really need to get a grip and realize that no one is scared of them anymore. Russia has shown the world that you can fight back against NATO and win. Yet countries like France still seem to think that they can terrorize modern independent nations like they terrorized african tribal communities.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The European elites are all just yapping dogs who feel safe to be as provocative and belligerent as they want because they think daddy USA will come to protect them if they ever get themselves into trouble by their own actions. This is a dangerous delusion, the US does not and has never had any loyalty toward its so-called “allies”, and when shit hits the fan they leave you holding the bag and fuck off. Europe may very well have to learn this the hard way. NATO is a massive bluff that the Russians just haven’t called yet, but nothing guarantees that this will stay that way forever, especially if they ever get really fed up with the Euros’ insolent bullshit. For my own sake as someone who has to keep living in this deindustrializing shit hole, i can only hope that the Russians continue to have the patience of a saint. I wouldn’t be half as patient as they are if i had to deal with these absolute children in charge in the EU right now.