• serinus@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “unfortunately” is weird. The judge is supposed to interpret law, not decide it. And he’s determined that this law conflicts with inalienable rights in another law for a particular reason.

    I understand people think it’s not broad enough, but more specific is more defensible, and more likely to stick.