The company that chartered the cargo ship that destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore was recently sanctioned by regulators for blocking its employees from directly reporting safety concerns to the U.S. Coast Guard — in violation of a seaman whistleblower protection law, according to regulatory filings reviewed by The Lever.

Eight months before a Maersk Line Limited-chartered cargo ship crashed into the Baltimore bridge, likely killing six people and injuring others, the Labor Department sanctioned the shipping conglomerate for retaliating against an employee who reported unsafe working conditions aboard a Maersk-operated boat. In its order, the department found that Maersk had “a policy that requires employees to first report their concerns to [Maersk]… prior to reporting it to the [Coast Guard] or other authorities.”

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Honestly, no: it’s clear that Biden intends to use Federal money in the short term to get the bridge back in service as quickly as possible, but it is not at all clear that he intends to let the shipping company (or whoever is ultimately responsible) off the hook for restitution after-the-fact.

    • helenslunch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay but, I mean, ask yourself what’s most likely to happen?

      • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You mean that the shipping company is going to be filing for bankruptcy protection in the relatively near future?

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The crew operator or subcontractor may file for bankruptcy. Maersk isn’t going anywhere.