However, only some people think the restorations are bad, and now they have a surprising advocate – noted film preservationist Robert Harris. Harris is the man behind the famous restorations of Lawrence of Arabia, Spartacus, The Godfather trilogy and many more. In a post to Home Theatre Forum, he acknowledged how different they look, but also explained that’s not necessarily a bad thing. On True Lies, “Shot 35 and blown up to 70, the visuals of the new 4k UHD are absolutely not what the film was upon release, but the secret sauce works, and allows a presentation that appears far better than it might without it.”

In a post about Aliens, he elaborated a bit more on why these restorations have his approval. “Original prints were on the grainy side, as a higher speed stock was used. I always thought it looked fine, as that was the look. No problem. But there were those who felt that it was too grainy. Enter the new 4k UHD from Disney via Fox, and it has an entirely new look. And it’s a look that I like. Very much! The image has been de-grained, with zero loss of resolution, which if anything as been slightly heightened. Color are meticulously reproduced. And there’s an overall clarity that is new to the film.”

As far as Harris is concerned, these restorations have been done the right way, and there is a lot of logic behind what he says. Cameron always favoured shooting his film in a process called Super 35, as it allowed him to print a larger film frame on the stock that would make the home video releases look better. In True Lies or Titanic, he was able to show the films in 2:35:1 scope theatrically. Then, when reformatted to 1:33:1 (the standard TV ratio in the era before widescreen TVs), he could reveal more of the frame at the top and bottom, avoided the pan-and-scan look common at the time, making the films play better at VHS. The downside was Super 35 was grainy. This wasn’t super noticeable on DVD and even 1080p Blu-rays, but it proved problematic on 4K, hence the restoration.

  • UKFilmNerd@feddit.ukOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    Check out the examples in the 4K section of the Blu-ray forums. True Lies is the worst, followed by Aliens and The Abyss comes off the best.

    The image has been upscaled and with the use of AI, the image has been scrubbed of all the grain.

    Unfortunately, the image now looks pretty bad in places with smooth waxy faces and strange anomalies as AI tries to improve the picture.

    I would’ve thought they would scan the original camera negatives, or next best thing, and then apply a little DNR to remove a little of the grain but apparently, this is what Cameron wanted.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d be ok with the 4k if they left the grain in. This is sort of like hos CBS replaced all the special effects on the original Star Trek series. It’s just not good.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I liked the new effects on TOS. A lot of the original ones looked terrible and they did generally keep the style so phasers beams and such don’t look out of place.

        Alien’s film grain is part of the movie’s look, though. It contributes to the atmosphere.

    • ziby0405@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wait… they used existing FHD/2K scans and upscaled those? And it still took this long for these to be released?

      Thank fucking god fan preservation efforts happen with 16 and 35mm film reel scans.