• Eleazar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn. I’m not even an atheist and I agree with OP. Your take is just antisemitic.

    We should take this a step further though. Any kind of genital mutilation should be illegal, including bottom surgery.

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also happened in a few places in the US. Cities or states tried to outlaw the practice and religious communities screeched about not being allowed to carve up babies’ bodies.

    • starman2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why does any kind of bottom surgery have to be illegal? Why not just limit it to consenting people above the age of majority?

      Grouping bottom surgery with genital mutilation makes you sound like an alt-right troll, and it bugs me that this is well received on this website.

      Edit: “I’m not even an atheist” means absolutely nothing. You’re just teaming up with an atheist in an online argument to bash Jews.

    • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bottom surgery should only be illegal if it’s done nonconsensually. Adults should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t pose a significant risk to their health.

      • starman2112@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Adults should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t pose a significant risk to someone else’s health

        Fixed that for you. Don’t give conservatives ammo to legislate my right to tattoos away.

        • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tattoos do not pose a significant risk to your health. Yes, there is a risk, there’s also a risk from riding a bike or going swimming. If it would put a person at significant risk for major health issues it should not be legal.

    • such_lettuce7970@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn I should tell my surgeon he mutilated me. And my other surgeon, who took out my tonsils, also mutilated me. My dental surgeon, the wisdom teeth removal - believe it or not, also mutilation. Don’t even get me started on my dad’s heart surgeon, that butcher.

      Moron.

      • Eleazar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry but yes, you should consider bottom surgery mutilation. There’s a difference between the other things but I’m sure you’re missing it.

        • niemcycle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The big difference is the consent; bottom surgery is done with the consent of the patient and circumsicions are typically done to babies who have no say in the matter. Heck, if someone wants to get circumsized later in life, they absolutely should be able to. Don’t get the whole thing about ‘mutilation’, adults should be able to do whatever they want to their bodies.

        • starman2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bottom surgery is literally, definitionally, not mutilation when it’s done for a consenting adult.

          If you want to call bottom surgery mutilation by your own definition, then literally every surgery is mutilation. But like, cutting out my defective heart and installing a working one, while technically “mutilating” me, is objectively a good for my health.

          You can call surgery mutilation if you want, but it isn’t helpful to anyone and it only serves to make transphobes feel good about themselves.

        • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So someone getting bottom surgery after their penis was irreparably damaged in an accident is being mutilated? Or someone treating a medical issue so they stop passing out from their Cramps? Wow, I’m glad my doc mutilated me out of pain. 🤦

          • Eleazar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you always try to start arguments by making shit up about what the other person said? Yes? Ok then, you do you I guess.

            • starman2112@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re saying that bottom surgery is genital mutilation. They’re giving examples of situations where even a transphobes should agree that bottom surgery is good. If it is mutilation in those examples, then you agree with what they said. If it isn’t mutilation in those examples, then it isn’t mutilation in the first place.

            • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              We should take this a step further though. Any kind of genital mutilation should be illegal, including bottom surgery.

              You said bottom surgery was mutilation and should be illegal. Those are both bottom surgeries, therefore by your own statement you think they should be illegal. I don’t have to make shit up when you already did that for me.

                • starman2112@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What are you talking about? They’re saying that bottom surgery has legitimate medical applications, which it does. I don’t know whether to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you just replied without reading the comment, or give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re smart enough to read and are actually calling people who get bottom surgery pedophiles.

                  Either way, this whole comment section is really making me second guess my commitment to quit reddit, if this is the caliber of discussion we have here.

                • starman2112@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lemme help you out here buddy

                  @Eleazar@sh.itjust.works made the incredibly transphobic and apparently popular argument that all bottom surgery is genital mutilation.

                  @such_lettuce7970@kbin.social replied to them, saying that they dont consider the bottom surgery they recieved to be genital mutilation.

                  @Eleazar@sh.itjust.works made the incredibly offensive comment that yes, actually, such_lettuce7970 was mutilated.

                  @RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world replied saying that sometimes bottom surgery is medically necessary, implying that when it is medically necessary, it’s wrong to consider it mutilation.

                  Then you called him a fucktard for some unfathomable reason.

                  @irmoz@reddthat.com said that you read their comment wrong, because you still assume they’re talking about infant circumcision.

                  Did this help?

                  • such_lettuce7970@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Thank you, yeesh. This is possibly the dumbest comment section I’ve ever seen on here. And yes, Eleazar is a transphobe, who quite ironically was arguing a week ago that homophobia, in Florida, amongst christians like themself, is rare and unpopular. Even if I bought that (I don’t and it feels like a classic “as a gay man” moment), it always makes my head shake when people are seemingly offended at being accused of homophobia, then turn around and go “oh, but those transes though, yeah fuck them”.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Circumcision isn’t mutilation. That’s a fact. Infant circumcision to appease a sky fairy or to fit in with your neighbours? Yeah that’s mutilation.

      • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It should be noted that some adults decide to receive bottom surgery and that’s respectable. It’s clear some people here don’t get the nuance.