“But the Trumpian part is that even though, or perhaps because, it may be part of a Trump scam, Knight now too may be on the hook for $175 million as it won’t automatically get out from underneath its own proffered surety.”

Hankey, a billionaire, has already said that his company will be able to post the money for Trump.

He was reacting to a comment on X by lawyer Dave Kingman, who wrote that Knight will not be able to post the $175 million.

“Understand that Knight Specialty has a problem. This bond cannot be approved. Under the CPLR [Civil Practice Laws and Rules] the surety will remain obligated under the bond until a replacement bond is filed. Trump is unlikely to get a replacement bond. Knight Spec will be liable AND Trump won’t have a stay [on enforcement],” he wrote.

  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Add tattoos. Yea. People are awful. “I like Alex Jones”. I have never wanted to punch a coworker so much in my life.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The way I respond is always ‘neutral’ but calling them what they are. So for Alex Jones I might say ‘oh the dude who lied about dead kids?’ the key is to sound neutral and then just disengage if they try to start a conversation about it. ‘yea I don’t care dude’.

      ‘tate? The rapist and woman beater? OK.’ just disengage on that topic. Make it see like you’re stating a fact, because you are and there’s no room for them to argue or engage.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        For real. It’s like they completely don’t get that it sounds so bad when you just stick to the facts.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah: “Isn’t he the guy who [insert atrocious fact or quote from whichever asshole here]” either gets them confused, usually resulting in a “but Hunter’s laptop” response, no matter the topic. Or they quiet down and move on in my experience.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I usually do the same thing in relation to donnie with magats that start up and don’t know me - I don’t engage on any of their latest insider ragebait too-online/too much Faux Cinematic Universe, and usually feign general uninterest in politics, but ask questions like - “Isn’t Trump the guy that was convicted of rape?”

            If I really want to go there and there are not children around, I’ll ask if Trump isn’t the guy that wants to fuck his own daughter? I do the same “many people are saying” tactic that donnie himself does and it usually shuts them right the hell up because if they want to start up with nonsense about Biden, I’ll just feign ignorance about any of their latest poutrage porn that they consume all day and ask why they don’t know that donnie wants to bang his own daughter.

            For the magats that are terminally online/in their own little magat bubble, someone saying this in such stark terms really tends to shock them for a few minutes. They might be used to trying to debate “nice” liberals/leftists on their terms, or with their framing, or hoping they can flip it into a conversation about something else…