- cross-posted to:
- news@hexbear.net
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@hexbear.net
- world@lemmy.world
Doesn’t massive investment into the military present generate an enormous, but false, short-term economic boost that quickly dissipates as the military has very little economic follow-through?
deleted by creator
It doesn’t have to be, military factories that produce military equipment can be converted into civilian factories that produce civilian commodities.
The argument that Russian economy is primarily growing due to military spending doesn’t really have any basis in reality.
But you post this as a source, which quite literally states that the growth is coming from oil exports, and increasingly high levels of government spending (One can only wonder towards what). So is the source wrong?
If you go the IMF source this is drawing from, along with the Carniege Endowment shudder, both those sources that the BBC are drawing from describe the increase as coming from surging prices in oil and government investment into the MIC.
This increase also follows nearly a year of negative GDP growth in 2022, so if anything, Russia is simply regaining already lost ground.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1009056/gdp-growth-rate-russia/
deleted by creator
The reality is that the MIC is a relatively small part of the overall economy, so it logically cannot account of majority of the growth. What’s actually happening is that all the western companies leaving Russia along with the sanctions created a lot of business niches that didn’t exist before. Domestic businesses are now filling these niches to meet demand. Russian economy is becoming restructured to be a lot more self sufficient as a result, and this is a very positive thing for Russia in the long run.