• edward@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    you’re welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I’ll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

    Legit fucking gaslighting. You know damn well there isn’t an edit history. But I replied to the part you removed with:

    What, political bias vs political alignment?

    My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

    • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Legit fucking gaslighting

      no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

      My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

      so you claim…

      • edward@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

        It’s unprovable, which you know damn well. I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s unprovable, which you know damn well.

          I also know that it’s not my problem, something you should have considered before making such a claim.

          I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

          so you claim…

          • edward@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            How about you respond to the part where I respond to what’s left of your comment?

            in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

            This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

            in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

            So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?

            • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              why would i give your fallacious argument legitimacy by engaging with it?

              your opinion notwithstanding, what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made-- nor can I be held responsible for such.

              • edward@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made

                Then please explain what the following means, because it isn’t proper grammar and you just called my best attempt at interpreting it “words I put in your mouth”.

                in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed