• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Apparently if someone genetically engineered a potato with pig genes (to make it extra tasty when roasted, presumably), it would be one but not the other, due to philosophical differences between Judaism and Islam.

    • Akasazh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Which one (not) and on what philosophical grounds ?

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t remember which one, but apparently the question of whether the genetics of a species define its nature for religious reasons is where Judaism and Islam diverge. One would hold that, if no actual pigs were involved, a potato with pig genes is just a potato and thus allowed, and the other would hold that the pig genes make it sufficiently porcine to be forbidden.

        • Akasazh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Interesting. Do you remember which side has which stance?