• iAmTheTot@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Would is generally used for future events that will occur under only certain conditions.

        At least, I think that’s the pedantry that they are going for.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That is correct.

          Yes, I’m being pedantic in a way. But Trump won’t win, period. He already lost in 2020 while being a sitting president. People wised up. They won’t be complacent.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              To be honest, I’ll feel more confident when that professor, who has been predicting the winner with almost 100% accuracy, announces his predictions.

              Edit: some articles report that he said that he’ll make a definitive prediction in August.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Will and would are all but interchangeable here. Would only “feels” like it fits better because it’s a hypothetical event, but it’s a cause and effect being talked about. Well, effect and cause but the point stands.

      Edit: I’d like to point out that “will” is future tense, and “would” is past tense.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re of course right.

        It’s just that I prefer to use “would” because it sounds less… hopeful?