• Jordan Lund@lemmy.oneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I were to guess, it’s because the drunks aren’t sleeping in tents, stealing everything that isn’t nailed down, and shitting on sidewalks… but that’s just a guess.

    • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      … and I’ve got news for you: you’re wrong. Conservative estimates suggest that at least 1/4 of the homeless in the US feel pretty to addiction through alcohol. Since meth is fairly available and much less expensive than a fifth or half gallon of booze, it’s also available to help you forget how cold it is sleeping on the street. If you’ve spent any time in Portland, you’d remember just how bad it was when the city would open the drunk tank and dump the homeless alcoholics back out onto the street - pissing and shitting themselves on the bus, Max or in the first of a business. This was commonplace in the mid 00s, I can’t imagine it’s any different now.

      Drugs are drugs are drugs. If we’re going to restrict, we need to restrict them all appropriately. We already know that the drug war on alcohol AND narcotics was a massive failure (saying nothing about how it’s turned virtually every country south of our border into narco states), so what’s next? Trafficking is still a felony in Oregon, why don’t cops enforce the law?

      • Jordan Lund@lemmy.oneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Conservative estimates suggest that at least 1/4 of the homeless in the US feel pretty to addiction through alcohol.”

        Or to invert your quote, 3/4 of the homeless in the US AREN’T addicted to alcohol… which is right in line with what I’m saying… the drunks aren’t the problem.

        But in the end, I’m not talking about the US in general, the US in general doesn’t have an equivalent of Measure 110 and if we’re lucky it never will.

        • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If other drugs have the same percentage of impact, or less (which is the case statistically, than alcohol, then what is the problem of the drinks aren’t the problem? If fentanyl users make up only 5% of the homeless, why go after them rather than the alcoholics?

          • Jordan Lund@lemmy.oneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The degree of impact is different. You don’t have drunks sleeping in tents built on a pile of 500 stolen and disassembled bicycles. You DO have that with meth and fentanyl.

            The impact on the community is many hundreds of times more than alcohol.