• IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Roney Beal, 72, a Shamong, New Jersey resident

    This person has literally nothing else to do but hammer this lawsuit until their untimely passing.

    When Beal told them that she would call her lawyer, they told her to get out of the casino and to not return. The Beals were then escorted off of the property, Di Croce said.

    But this person is literally 72, the casino could hypothetically just wait them out.

    Di Croce hopes Bally’s wants to make this situation right with Beal. After suffering a heart attack last year, Beal turned to the casino for enjoyment.

    I mean and there’s a good chance the lawyers just drag for as long as they can. Odds are favorable for the casino winning on things just sorting themselves out naturally here.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 month ago

      When Beal told them that she would call her lawyer, they told her to get out of the casino and to not return. The Beals were then escorted off of the property, Di Croce said.

      This part - as soon as you say “lawyer,” everything goes through attorneys. Their being escorted off the property was not vindictive.

      • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes. I do this to people at my workplace from time to time. Well, rarely having to remove them from the premises. This is usually over email or the phone.

        As soon as a client mid-tantrum threatens to sue or call their lawyer thinking it’ll “intimidate” me into capitulating on not delivering the impossible, instead they find themselves very thoroughly stonewalled because I cannot discuss any topic that is the subject of litigation nor communicate with clients undergoing litigation in any capacity. I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        I’m sorry, all inquiries must be made to our legal department.

        Etc…

        It’s gold every time it happens.

        • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think your clients constantly getting so upset that they want to sue is a good thing.

            • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yup, I worked a call center for a minute during covid. It shocked me how often people said we’d be hearing from their lawyers. At that point we informed the caller all further communication would have to be through their and our attorneys and we could no longer discuss the issue with them. This wasn’t an evil or adversarial company in the least, it was closer to an advocate for those impacted economically at that time.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I work as a manager in contract security.

                My favorite was this time an 22 year old kid couldn’t complete the application. He kept calling asking how to fill it out. Questions like, “what goes in “name”… age. Literally everything.

                The HR staff basically told him that speaking and writing technical English, and being able to fill out forms was a job requirement and if he was unable to complete the application (which really is basic.) he’s unqualified.

                Guy’s dad was a lawyer. It was probably a set up to scam us. The only proper response was “all communications go through our legal team. [click]”.

                Ultimate the lawyer got disbarred for threatening legal action unless we paid them a settlement, while not actually taking said action. It was almost hilarious.

                Slightly different in that he didn’t to pursue things, the asshole employee that maced a bunny rabbit and tried to sue us for wrongful termination. (Legal team would reply to the “would you just like to settle?” Offer by sending a video of him macing the bunny. Iirc, the lawyers decided to no longer represent him. He went through three or four firms. (Don’t lie to your lawyers…)

                (Edited for clarity and and some extra details.)

      • Bipta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re a lot better off invoking the attorney general’s office first for this reason.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone that grew up a half hour from Atlantic City, and has to go there frequently as a transit hub…you’re correct. The casinos are a sad, sad place. Especially during the week.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      they don’t need to drag it out. she’s suing the wrong party. Bally’s don’t own the machines or manage the jackpot she’s trying to claim; IGT does. it’s like suing a convenience store because your lotto ticket was a misprint.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      She’s a gambling addict. They should just give her the payout, they’ll get it back eventually

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      You think? I feel like these stories happen all the time and a faulty machine is valid to not pay out. Maybe she’ll get a settlement out of it.

      • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s also not usually invalid just because it won when it “shouldn’t” have. It’s actually displaying a payout much higher than the listed value for the maximum payout of the machine.

        Now, I feel like the fair thing would be paying that maximum payout and adding something on top for the customer’s troubles. But that probably isn’t going to satisfy someone who unreasonably expected $1.27m.