Republican state Rep. Alex Kolodin says he used the artificial intelligence software to help define a subsection of a bill Gov. Katie Hobbs signed into law.

archive.is

Shall we trust LM defining legal definitions, deepfake in this case? It seems the state rep. is unable to proof read the model output as he is “really struggling with the technical aspects of how to define what a deepfake was.”

  • slurpinderpin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    345·
    6 months ago

    These types of things are exactly what Generative AI models are good for, as much as Internet people don’t want to hear it.

    Things that are massively repeatable based off previous versions (like legislation, contracts, etc) are pretty much perfect for it. These are just tools for already competent people. So in theory you have GenAI crank out the boring stuff and have an expert “fill in the blanks” so to speak

    • CameronDev@programming.devEnglish
      82·
      6 months ago

      True, if the LLM is training on those legal documents. Less true if its trained on whatever random garbage was scrapped out of reddit.

      At least this time the Rep. was actually reviewing the output, so thats responsible at least.

      • slurpinderpin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        4 months ago

        There are, just not available publicly. Tons of enterprises (law firms included) are paying to have models trained on their data