• neatchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Are you suggesting that the massacre itself wasn’t a mistake?

      EDIT: To clarify, are you saying it wasn’t an immoral choice? Or simply that it was intentional?

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are pointing out that it was intentional and part of a widwr pattern.

        That genocidal ghoul Netanyahu is 36,000 deep in corpses right now, many of them children. He hasn’t suddenly grown a conscience or empathy. Something else is going on.

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok, because it could be read the other way as well which would be seriously fucked up :/

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 month ago

    So many tragic, incompetent mistakes. Almost like that’s what we’ve been warning about.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Even assuming it was a tragic mistake, which it wasn’t. It was a deliberate massacre to show defiance to the ICJ ruling of Friday.

      But let’s assume it was a mistake for once, even though decapitating children and burning other children alive in a designated safe zone you sent them to, is nothing but a barbaric mass killing committed by genocidal mass murderers.

      Okay but now really to the point. If we ignore all that, and assuming an actual mistake, who the fuck can give them weapons then? If someone at the shooting range just starts blasting around and killing dozens of people he would never ever be handed a gun again. If someone works as demolition man and blows up the occupied apartment building instead of the old factory 5 km away he was supposed to, he would at best be committed to an asylum and also never ever be handed any explosives again.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Put it on the pile with the other tens of thousands of tragic mistakes by the IDF. And with the ones they’ll so accidentally make tomorrow.

      • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Murder? I saw the persons comment and it was clearly sarcasm. But I did not expect anything else from you. You delete everything that’s not to your liking, I remember you deleting my own comment for absolutely zero good reason.

        • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yes, it was meant in sarcasm. Oh well. It’s not always easy to convey that in text. Appreciate your efforts.

            • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              Not the one you commented to but I found it interesting that you could still see it. So I tried another Lemmy app and now, I’m able to see it too as well.

              One app shows “removed” and the other still shows the comment. Quite odd.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Definitely read it as sarcasm, but maybe I read it after the ‘quotes’ were added.