• Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    the bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require all that power. nothing about the code dictates that. it’s a social phenomenon, just like the markets.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Okay, “maintain” isn’t the right word, but the mining process is designed that way and it’s baked into the whole currency. Actual work could have been done, but instead we burned it all for imaginary money (which isn’t much different from fiat currency).

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The bitcoin blockchain requires more power than any other blockchain while providing less features.

      The only outstanding feature of bitcoin is it’s price.

      • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        the bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require any power. any miner can stop, the blockchain would have less power, and still continue to function.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require any power.

          Yes. It does. No transaction can occur without proof of work being performed.

          any miner can stop, the blockchain would have less power, and still continue to function.

          Marginally less power, but nowhere near the reduction needed to compete with a PoS blockchain.

          For example Ethereum PoS uses 2,600 MWh per year (= a single 1MW windfarm). Bitcoin uses 53,000x more energy than Ethereum.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              the whole network could be run on two raspberry pis.

              No. Then someone would buy 3 raspberry pis and claim all the bitcoin.

              Bitcoin was a great idea in 2008 but in 2024 it has been overshadowed by other blockchains in every single dimension except for market cap.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  We are discussing energy usage, not consensus protocols.

                  The Bitcoin network never going to run on any number raspberry pis. Any claims that it will compete with a PoS blockchain for energy efficiency are ludicrous.